Canadian company Mitel offers MiContact Center, a call and contact center solution designed for both small businesses and larger enterprises. It comes in several different iterations that support various needs and use cases.
$7
per month
Spanning Backup
Score7.4 out of 10
N/A
Spanning, a Kaseya company, is a provider of backup and recovery for SaaS applications including G Suite, Salesforce and Office 365.
N/A
Pricing
MiContact Center
Spanning Backup
Editions & Modules
Brightmetrics for Mitel MiContact Center
$7
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MiContact Center
Spanning Backup
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
MiContact Center
Spanning Backup
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of MiContact Center and Spanning Backup
Feature
MiContact Center
8.5
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Spanning Backup
-
Ratings
Agent dashboard
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Validate callers
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Outbound response
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call forwarding
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warm transfer
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Predictive dialing
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive voice response
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
REST APIs
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call scripts
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call tracking
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multichannel integration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM software integration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of MiContact Center and Spanning Backup
Feature
MiContact Center
8.6
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Spanning Backup
-
Ratings
Inbound call routing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Omnichannel inbound routing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recording
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quality management
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call analytics
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Historical reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer surveys
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of MiContact Center and Spanning Backup
Feature
MiContact Center
-
Ratings
Spanning Backup
9.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Management dashboard
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Retention options
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Encryption
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of MiContact Center and Spanning Backup
Feature
MiContact Center
-
Ratings
Spanning Backup
9.7
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Operational reporting and analytics
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Malware protection
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
SaaS Backup
Comparison of SaaS Backup features of MiContact Center and Spanning Backup
We used to have Cloudagent from Ozonetel and due to multiple downtimes and frequent disconnects, It is a good tool for a well-settled call center but is not suitable for startups due to high procurement costs. But the sophistication makes up for the lack of support from the team. The tool is absolute bliss.
The only issue we have is when we remove the user from the integrated AD group we need to manually go back and remove the licensing, but there is the option to have archived accounts as well for temporary holds in case we want to disable the account in 365/AD, but need to hold on to the backups for a little longer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The ability to checkmark JUST a single OU and then any new members in just THAT OU would be automatically backed up. Currently, you can just auto add new members but not per OU.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It was hands down, one of the easiest solutions to implement overall and has some of the best features also compared to other similar products from many SaaS backup companies. We also integrated the Dark Web monitoring too and it has helped us secure accounts we didn't know had issues, so has improved our security posture too.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would like a retention option on the data, but since this feature does not currently exist, I give it a 9. Everything has met our standards and needs and we are now freed up from the manual efforts it was taking for backing up Salesforce using the out-of-the-box features of Salesforce.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
- Great Tool for contact center who would like to have all the processes under single roof - Premium features and best analytics to understand the process metrics - We have been able to onboard new joiner's easily without much support form the MITEl team and they have been working ever since.
Spanning is superior to Veritas Backup Exec. Often Backup Exec would fail due to the software itself or the premise-based backup media or drive. Veritas Tech Support/Knowledgebase was not helpful in troubleshooting the failures. Also, Veritas was unable to back up our then Microsoft Exchange Server without an additional add-on cost. Barracuda was more reliable, but also required additional expenses for backing up Exchange and Microsoft SQL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info