Microsoft 365 Copilot vs. Microsoft Copilot Studio

I highly recommend its usage in Teams meetings to prepare a session transcript, meeting minutes,
next steps and recognize speech by person. Also within the meeting recording, there is separation between the people talking at the time. The Copilot image creation is very accurate and useful to
customize my PowerPoint presentations and other documents

Incentivized

Where you have a very finite and specific use case, that matches well with the intended use case of the product, it tends to be a great fit. For example we created a plain language chatbot which can rewrite any given piece of text into plain language, referring to specific internal standards.

Incentivized

• Good analysis of the ticket system at the service desk, so that this can be anticipated properly
• For the management of IT environments, quick examples of scripting for desired solutions
• For consultants and managers, they co-pilot a technical report into language understandable to a non-technical client, including a visual summary.

Incentivized

• Agentic workflows
• AI chatbots
• Deploying via Teams
• Multiple knowledge sources

Incentivized

• The quality of image generation in Microsoft Copilot could be improved. Compared to other AI platforms, Copilot's images often fall short in quality and frequently contain typos.
• When generating agents and chatbots, Microsoft Copilot currently doesn't appear to support file download functionality.
• The email reply function is useful, but the responses can sometimes be overly elaborate. It would be helpful to have more options for adjusting the tone.

Incentivized

• Ability to combine multiple sources in one query (indexing)
• SharePoint integration - word count limit detrimental
• Clearer communication and understanding of features and limitations

Incentivized

Absolutely!!! I have a high regard for the product and will use it for years to come.

Incentivized

it is nearly perfect and it’s usability one of the main factors and contributing to the score is how versatile this tool is. it is vastly usable in a multitude of circumstances, and has a few limitations, but overall this product works well for what it is intended. It is very helpful for some otherwise time consuming tasks.

Microsoft Copilot Studio is very easy to design new chatbot agents and deploy them to users, it revolutionises the ability to develop and deploy these types of solutions at scale. It does something similar to Power Automate - where it is a low/no code solution that enables tech capabilities not easily possible prior.

Incentivized

I think It lost the race for now. I don't think Microsoft will keep investing on it since we have better tools outside their environment. In my opinion, Microsoft Copilot is not even in the benchmark tools and in the race for AGI. I think Microsoft is way behind and Microsoft Copilot suffered the lack of investment like the one made by its competitors.

Incentivized

Really there is no other solution for enterprises than Microsoft Copilot Studio, as every business in New Zealand is already using MS licensing and backend infrastructure. This addition is game changing for those who otherwise would be locked out of solutions that would require new licensing structures to enable these capabilities.

Incentivized

• It is too early to tell at the moment but I can see it as a positive moving forward
• The amount of time saved in creating content will be a huge asset for faculty
• The same holds true for students as they to will be able to safe a lot of time

Incentivized

• Speed of delivery
• Scale of deployment
• Increase of access

Incentivized