Microsoft BizTalk Server vs. OpenText MBPM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft BizTalk
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft BizTalkOpenText MBPM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
15% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings4.03 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Process designer00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings7.13 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
7% below category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BizTalk Server
-
Ratings
OpenText MBPM
6.0
2 Ratings
30% below category average
Content management00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
7.1
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft BizTalk ServerOpenText MBPM
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
BizTalk is well suited as middleware. Where you wish to translate an input file into an output file and send it to some endpoint. In our case, we used it to convert and send files to SAP. In many ways, it very flexible, and you can do almost anything you want with it. In many ways, it's a better solution than your SAP XI or PI as middleware, since it's much less expensive, and allows you do interface with non-SAP systems.
Read full review
OpenText
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It is very user friendly. Users can change rules during run time and change workflow.
  • Huge capacity for queueing messages. It supports all types of adapters like Oracle, Salesforce, SMTP, FTP, etc. Also users can built custom adaptors.
  • If users want to dynamically deploy their solution without any downtime, this is a perfect solution. BizTalk will be a good fit, especially for public-facing websites.
  • Well-proven in the market. I used it when developing a website for Virgin Trains, catering more than 800K user requests per day.
  • Helps in load balancing.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Microsoft BizTalk is over engineered for some situtations
  • Microsoft BizTalk can be frustrating to use as it forces you to use the GUI as opposed to code
  • Microsoft BizTalk is very resource intensive to create integrations
Read full review
OpenText
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
BizTalk will always be required at this hospital.
Read full review
OpenText
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I gave a 7 because this product BizTalk does need time and training to get familiar with the usability and features, it is not that easy to use.
Read full review
OpenText
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
BizTalk Server has been supported for more than 15 years. It is well proven in the market. Microsoft has provided excellent support with technical issues.
Read full review
OpenText
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Make sure you have everybody and all depts. On board during testing on test server.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
BizTalk was selected here mainly because it is easy to integrate to a .NET application (most of them are Web Service, WCF SOAP, WCF REST and Web API) and many backend databases are Microsoft SQL Server. Another benefit is that the monitoring job is easy to set up and centralize with other .NET application monitoring jobs.
Read full review
OpenText
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • A positive impact has been the quicker turnaround time of a part request and that part showing up in SAP using Biztalk as middleware.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the somewhat insufficient error logging/message capture settings that Biztalk provide. This has caused occasional delays when attempted to create parts for the business.
  • A somewhat negative impact has been the need to have a specialized developer who understands Biztalk to troubleshoot issues with the Biztalk and SAP interaction when creating parts, and when adding new fields to the parts.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
  • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
  • Management information from the system has improved decision making
Read full review
ScreenShots