Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Workamajig
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Workamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Workamajig
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Workamajig
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
3.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
22% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
23% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.0
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.16 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and Workamajig
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info