Microsoft Stream is an enterprise video option available to users of Microsoft 365 as part of the Office 365 E1 edition tier. Users can create explainer videos and send videos to Teams channels, SharePoint sites, Microsoft Viva Engage posts, Microsoft Viva Connections, and Microsoft365.com to inform and align with colleagues in the flow of work.
N/A
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Marketing Cloud is an AI-powered, cloud-based digital marketing platform within the Salesforce Customer 360 ecosystem. Marketers can segment their audience, deliver personalized messages, track campaign performance, engage leads and accounts, and optimize strategies based on real-time insights.
$1,250
per month per installation
Pricing
Microsoft Stream
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Account Engagement
$1,250
per month
Engagement
$1,250
per month
Intelligence
$3,000
per month
Loyalty Management
$20,000
per month
Personalization
$100,000
per year
Data Cloud for Marketing
$108,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Stream
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Stream
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Features
Microsoft Stream
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
5.2
1 Ratings
49% below category average
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Video access controls
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
User management
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video link sharing
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal video
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
External video
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
3.7
1 Ratings
76% below category average
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Player customization
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded videos
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.5
170 Ratings
1% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
7.7121 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.8152 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.1111 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
7.5120 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
7.4150 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
6.9110 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
7.7131 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
8.0128 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
7.594 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.9
123 Ratings
1% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
8.1108 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
7.9109 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
7.6115 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.2100 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.5
113 Ratings
1% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
7.8102 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
7.396 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.3
87 Ratings
2% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
7.582 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
7.138 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Stream
-
Ratings
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
7.7
123 Ratings
5% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.0117 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.7122 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
7.499 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Stream is good for recording and capturing discussion from meetings. I would say that it isnt appropriate where there is lots of detail and lots of varying topics discussed as the summarising tool can in these instances be too broad. It is really good where meetings have been left or missed; as the notes and transcript allow for easy catchup
I think the product, by definition, is meant for marketing — and we use it exactly for that, for running campaigns. That’s the best-suited use case for the product. I don’t think it’s really meant to be used for anything else — that’s just not how it’s designed.
As of right now we have not seen any other program that integrates as seamlessly into our Salesforce platform. We have barely scratched the surface of all the features and use cases. It would be irresponsible to make a move to another platform in the near future. We have not come up against any limitations that would prompt a need to switch
Its integration into the Teams stack allows for ease of use without having to leave the application to access it elsewhere. Its interface is intuitive and easy to use. Sharing could be better. Transcripts and notes are very good
You won't find another solution that has as many features as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Interaction Studio. We all know Salesforce, we all know how big they are and it's not for nothing... Their tools do most of the things you want, need and even imagine. Using it is complicated, but the usability is infinite.
Upgrades and timing of the upgrades were communicated well and planned during off hours for our work. If we did have a campaign scheduled during that time, it would kick-off after the system was back active. There were a few unplanned system down times, but it was a rare occurrence and those times were also short in duration.
Though the make up of MA apps is not built this way today, it would be nice to see them become more real-time. The integration between Salesforce and Pardot is not a true real-time integration. If I modify something in Salesforce, those changes are not automatically reflected in Pardot immediately. There is a delay of about 15 minutes before the systems sync. This delay, although not long, is less than ideal We would love the systems to be integrated real time such that changes are propagated from one system to the other immediately.
They are really responsive and more than not solve the problem or give you insight to how you can manage the solution yourself. I do find however sometimes a long delay on the more complex issues when they need to loop in other departments. but overall a good experience with support
The trainers at the Pardot user conference (Elevate and Connections) were very knowledgeable and presented the material well. Again, the content was targeted to more of a new user audience, and was not really relevant for folks who had been using the product for 2+ years.
Pardot's online training touches on all topics briefly and vaguely without much indepth exploration into how a final outcome could look, such as Nurturing Campaigns, Email templates, landing page templates, etc... The only true way to uncover Pardot's full capabilities is to have Front End design and coding experience. Without this key skill set, I would not recommend Pardot to another business.
From an IT perspective, once you set up the Javascript beacon and start collecting data there is a waiting game. During this time you can start labeling your site actions which can be labor intensive for a single person, but you don't really have the final end-users on the platform yet. We did a lot of training so users were experienced, but it wasn't until they had their first tasks to accomplish that they started using the system and had questions. I'd recommend setting up some immediate goals for an end-user to start segmenting for the purpose of displaying message campaigns so you can jump start end-user action.
Consensus is better for lead generation and sharing marketing content; however, Stream is most appropriate for capturing meeting recordings when using teams. its integration flawlessly allows for such a slick process that using an external solution wouldn't
We use Salesforce Marketing Cloud for lead management, generating reports, tracking customer and dealer information, inputting orders, and more. I prefer HubSpot for email marketing and automation because it is easier to use and the emails are designed much better. We currently use Salesforce and HubSpot, and we are very happy to have both, as they have different pros/cons.
Prior to this, we had no solution and literally were doing things on paper in a world where technology is outpacing paper. Having this process optimized has made it easier for the sales and marketing people to change information. From the training perspective, it has allowed us to see holes in where we could create additional support training, so the ROI here has been a lot more than just the optimization of a process.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to more efficiently reach out to a higher number of prospects.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to nimbly communicate important messages in a timely fashion to facilitate conversion.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud allows us to track who is opening our messages so that we can stop sending to those not interested and focus on the most engaged audiences.