TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft System Center vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft System Center

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft System Center is an enterprise-grade IT Operations Management (ITOM) suite designed for the centralized administration of data center infrastructure, virtualized environments, and hybrid cloud workloads. The platform provides unified management across heterogeneous environments, including support for Windows Server, Linux, and Azure Stack HCI. System Center is Microsoft's ITOM stack for organizations that maintain a significant on-premise footprint, vs the company's Azure-based…

    $1,323

    per month

    OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AWebroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.

    $150

    per year per 5 seats

    Pricing
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Editions & Modules
    Standard Edition
    $1323
    Datacenter Edition
    $3607
    Business Endpoint Protection
    $150.00
    per year per 5 seats
    Business Endpoint Protection
    $690.00
    per year per 25 seats
    Business Endpoint Protection
    Contact sales team
    per 50+ seats
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    91%
    Would buy again
    31 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    33 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    31 Answers
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    28 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Microsoft System Center and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Feature
    Microsoft System Center
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    7.8
    24 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings7.222 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Centralized Management00 Ratings8.224 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings6.513 Ratings
    Infection Remediation00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.220 Ratings
    Malware Detection00 Ratings8.223 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (58 ratings)
    7.8
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (5 ratings)
    8.2
    (8 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (14 ratings)
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft System CenterOpenText Core Endpoint Protection
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    For companies with more than 10 Windows devices and needing to standardize the OS, AV, access, share resources, and install software. SCCM is the way to go. This software is unnecessary if the business is all remote users and not in an office-type setting. There are cloud offerings or none to accomplish what a business needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Allows the grouping of devices by user.
    • Allows controlling updates being deployed to user devices.
    • Allows for the repurposing of machines by being able to load new or updated software on machines that already are in the system.
    • Allows us the ability to wipe a machine clean and restore it back to the configuration that was assigned the machine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It is very light weight and does not tax the computers resources
    • Has a quick scan and does not take forevere when scanning
    • It's central management on the web makes it easy to use and gives tons of control for Admins
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The product could improve in the area of having better mechanisms in place with how the SCEP client is deployed/installed from the server on the management side. We have run into this firsthand with the client not installing on an endpoint, and then having to take the time to investigate why it was not installing.
    • A second improvement that can be made is to keep trying to improve the products detection rate for finding malware/viruses. The case can be made that there are some products out there that do a better job at this and have a higher detection rate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • There are several configuration options for both end-point and DNS protection. Would like a more simple way to understand and validate settings.
    • Support is heavily video or FAQ based although you can submit a Support Ticket. Would like more availability to an actual support engineer.
    • Overtime you can forget how to change setting - a refresher course would be nice, especially as new features are added to the solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Webroot Endpoint Protection has been great for us, as its simple, cloud-based management console allows us to quickly deploy easily monitor all of our endpoints. However, it could improve by offering more customizable reporting options for deeper insights into security events and the interface could also use some updating, as it feels a bit dated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    There is a fair amount of documentation out there to help you when you have questions or run into issues with this product as well as tutorials on some of the more common tasks. Between the documentation and the overall ease of use we haven't had to deal with direct Microsoft support for this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows Updates, causing IT to have to constantly touch machines after they were imaged and update or manage them with a much more hands on approach.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Webroot is good in a way that it is an all encompassing solution one stop shop for protecting endpoints but it needs to be managed and licensed. Some users do not need constant protection or need to have it on their machines in where the combination of Field Effect and Malwarebytes is more effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • It has allowed the enterprise to standardize on a single platform for monitoring.
    • Easier troubleshooting of issues with Microsoft platforms.
    • Greater visibility of issues across platforms when applications are hosted in a mixed environment.
    • Additional costs for monitoring systems that are not directly supported with additional packs (iSeries, Linux on Power).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The DNS filtering allows for a very granular configuration of endpoints
    • The cost to benefit ratio is good. It is not a real EDR player yet, but the development looks promising
    • Its best feature is integration with our MSP software, providing actionable tickets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots