Mikogo is a free screen sharing solution with built-in VoIP for online meetings, web presentations, web conferencing and sales demos.
$156
Annually
Panda Patch Management
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security provides Panda Patch Management, a patching and vulnerability management solution.
N/A
Pricing
Mikogo
Panda Patch Management
Editions & Modules
Basic Annual
$156
Annually
Professional Annual
$228
Annually
Professional Lifetime
$456
Lifetime License per User
Team Annual
$468
Annually
Team Lifetime
$936
Lifetime License [Unlimited Users]
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mikogo
Panda Patch Management
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Enterprise plans are also available for larger organizations, with a custom number of users, meeting participants, and channels. Master Administration and Web API integrations are also available. Contact Mikogo for further information.
At first it worked fairly well and the price was very inexpensive. The first task when connecting to a customer was to have them download the client. Oftentimes this task took two to five minutes and was inconsistent even for clients with high-speed internet access (over …
I see a lot of the same functionality with both programs. From a presentation and meeting aspect, they are virtually the same. Where Mikogo stands out, in my opinion, is when it comes to remote access.
Mikogo has simple features and is easy to use. If you don't need lots of bells and whistles and just want to screen share or video conference on a small scale Mikogo works best. Join.me & TeamViewer are a bit confusing for the novice small business person. My experience with …
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory …
Given its narrow focus and inability to do that well, I cannot think of a scenario where Mikogo would be a fit. This software only provides 'attended' remote sessions whereby the person presenting their screen must also approve the connection of the user attempting to view or control their screen. While this has its place, it did not perform well in this limited scope.
Perfect for medium-to-large enterprises where endpoint management becomes complex, the tool helps maintain security and monitor issues detected on workstations and/or threats via the web, USB, etc. I do not recommend this tool for small businesses, however, due to its high annual licensing cost—an aspect of the product that could stand to be improved.
Collaboration audio/video - Very strong features. It simple and it just works as you expect. Especially multi-user collaboration capability.
File sharing - Again, nothing fancy but works as advertised.
Inexpensive- A single license allows for up to 25 participants and 3 concurrent calls. Even the free version is extremely capable and a good go-to option.
I believe the tool could be improved by adding additional features—particularly for operating system update management, such as the ability to create management groups—thereby centralizing all patch management in a single console and enhancing agility and security for workstations. It could also include a dashboard to notify users of new patches, centralize news about critical software patches, and so on.
Mikogo has simple features and is easy to use. If you don't need lots of bells and whistles and just want to screen share or video conference on a small scale Mikogo works best. Join.me & TeamViewer are a bit confusing for the novice small business person. My experience with LogMeIn has been that it's sluggish. GoToMeeting works great but is pricey for the small firm that mainly does one-to-one support/training. I couldn't get Zoom to work right.
Panda features a faster, more intuitive management console with settings that are easy for network administrators to understand, thereby enabling them to utilize the tool's full range of capabilities. Panda also consumes significantly less RAM, in contrast to the high memory usage associated with Trend on desktops.