Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
NGINX Plus
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Plus is presented as a cloud‑native, easy-to-use reverse proxy, load balancer, and API gateway, from F5.
$849
per month billed annually
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Portainer is a centralized container management platform for containerized apps and IoT device management. It helps accelerate container adoption and reduce time-to-value on Kubernetes, Docker, and Swarm with a management portal, allowing users to deliver and manage containerized applications from the data center to the edge. Portainer helps - Reduce the operational complexity associated with multi-cluster management Bridge the skills gap and facilitate feature…
$0
Pricing
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$849
per month billed annually
Advanced
$2,099
per month billed annually
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
Portainer Business - 3 Nodes Free
$0
Home & Student
$149
per year
Starter
$995
per year
Professional
$2995
per year
Enterprise
Contact Sales for Pricing
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Considered Multiple Products
NGINX Ingress Controller

No answer on this topic

NGINX Plus

No answer on this topic

Portainer
Chose Portainer
None, as I don’t need to
Features
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
2 Ratings
4% below category average
NGINX Plus
-
Ratings
Portainer
8.4
94 Ratings
3% above category average
Security and Isolation7.52 Ratings00 Ratings8.690 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.52 Ratings00 Ratings7.983 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.21 Ratings00 Ratings8.770 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.92 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.92 Ratings00 Ratings8.490 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.575 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.580 Ratings
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
NGINX Ingress Controller
-
Ratings
NGINX Plus
8.2
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Portainer
-
Ratings
IDE support00 Ratings8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings8.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(2 ratings)
8.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(93 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
8.4
(15 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
NGINX Ingress ControllerNGINX PlusPortainer
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
Read full review
F5
Makes our life easy as application admins in securing our applications and making them accessible. We can easily add an application within a few minutes and define the backend servers right away.
Read full review
Portainer
Many developers, especially lesser experienced developers, don't have a really good background in setting up containers from the command line. Portainer is invaluable to them. Giving a UI to them gives them much more confidence and allows them to learn properties and capabilities of containers under far less stress. On the flip side of this, giving then a UI on a production system can lead to chaos...never give junior developers access to production servers.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Read full review
F5
  • APIGW
  • Policy Enforcement
  • Centrally Manage API Traffic
Read full review
Portainer
  • Separating server maintenance with application development, providing a clear user interface for developers who don't want to worry about the underlying server.
  • RBAC for container deployment linked to a SAML IDP, not something particularly easy in a native Docker instance but point and shoot in Portainer, allowing the use of Azure / Okta etc to provide user access.
  • Image management with multiple repositories is super clear and reduces incidents
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
Read full review
F5
  • An AI bot would be cool to help build config files
  • More webinars for advanced NGINX Plus would be great
  • GUI tool... might already be one available
Read full review
Portainer
  • When setting up static IPs for a new container, having the used ones for a specific network at hand would be cool or something like a mini IPAM of some sort...
  • Using the developertools to see "oh, it's a 40x or 500" when something doesn't seem to load because the ui just states "Didn't work" is kinda annoying. expandable toasts or something would be nice.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
No answers on this topic
F5
No reason not to renew it, we are happy with it.
Read full review
Portainer
It is an excellent tool.
Read full review
Usability
F5
No answers on this topic
F5
Very easy to use
Read full review
Portainer
Accessibility for Non-Experts: even with some people having a bit longer on-boarding it is still very simple Quick setup is insanely useful, we can get it running in 10 seconds after installing docker Portainer has once again super clean UI and is very user friendly. Deployment/monitoring and management are super easy. I can tell just from a glance if something is out of date (watching at you Watchtower not doing your job for some reason)
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
F5
We had an issue after upgrading from RHEL 7 to 8, and there were some issues that the security team imposed upon the platform with a scanning tool. We also had a VXLAN environment that was not properly sending a gratuitous arp to the network. NGINX support was instrumental to speedily resolving our issue.
Read full review
Portainer
One of their staff members jumped on a video call immediately with me and led me through the problem and solution during a quick session of screen sharing. In this day and age that is above and beyond, especially when it comes to software. It took approximately 5-10 minutes to diagnose and fix, including pleasantries!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
F5
No answers on this topic
Portainer
It is really easy. Just follow the documentation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Read full review
F5
The API and dashboard alone make NGINX Plus a better choice.
Read full review
Portainer
Portainer takes the cup in terms of usability and features. It is also more useful for smaller deployments, whereas Kubernetes in our opinion and experience, could probably be more suited to certain other use cases. Portainer is also a fresh feel among all the preexisting container management solutions and brings positivity and a new breeze in the industry.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
Read full review
F5
  • We are planning by using NGINX it can greatly reduce our OPEX by 50% "just our own running APIGW" the cascading effects in the long run will be much more.
Read full review
Portainer
  • Increased productivity: Portainer's user-friendly interface and streamlined container management can help increase the productivity of IT teams.
  • Cost savings: By simplifying container management, Portainer can help reduce the time and resources required to manage container environments, potentially leading to cost savings.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Portainer Screenshots

Screenshot of Portainer is a universal container management platform to help adopt and manage Docker, Kubernetes, Nomad and Edge environments.