Office Ally in Vancouver, Washington offers their suite of interactive asp internet based solutions allowing for patient care from the point of contact in the physician's office to receiving payment from the insurance companies and providing overall care management from the IPAs and Health Plans. For $29.95 per month/provider, Office Ally offers EHR 24/7, an Electronic Health Records Program designed to allow healthcare providers to spend more time with patients and less time on paperwork.
$39.95
per month
Qualifacts Insync
Score1.5 out of 10
N/A
Qualifacts InSync offers a cloud-based healthcare IT solutions configured specifically to the user's practice and workflows. EHR, practice management, medical billing, telemedicine, e-prescribing and patient portal for practices of all sizes.
Smaller doctor or dental offices would be fine using Office Ally for patient visits and appointments; it's easy to use and learn, and I'm able to handle most needs with it. For a larger practice, there are better, more technologically advanced software products that would offer more streamlined and professional statements, schedules, and accounting needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This software is a giant piece of flaming garbage. I would never recommend this to my worst enemy. I cannot tell you how frustrating it is that I have gone more than four months to try to get benefit eligibility to consistently work. I have submitted over 40 different attachments of images and videos showing what we are seeing. I have had to have tickets open with Inovalon and Qualifacts on the issue, escalating the issue to top tech support people, escalating it to our account manager, and escalating it with billing. Still, after numerous tickets, complaints, and tech support phone calls, we still haven't gotten a resolution.On top of that, Qualifacts has no problem billing us for this feature that isn't even working properly or responding to any emails regarding the excess use charges for a service that has been tested for the past four-plus months by tech support, and then charging us for that extra use.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There needs to be a way to print patient visit summaries for a date range vs printing one summary for each appointment, one at a time.
It would be helpful if the top row of the calendar, showing doctors/practitioners names, would remain on the screen when scrolling to the end of the day. Appointments get scheduled under the wrong doctor at times because the names disappear and columns get confused.
There should be a way to view/print/download what has been paid, per patient, to the office in one place vs searching for payments under the Accounting Tab and payments tracked under Patient visits.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We would love to be able to send reports via secure email (the functionality s there, but the other party needs the same software, and that is rare in our area
We would love to have electronic visit verification integrated into the software - right now we need to use a 3rd party software package
Can be overly complicated at times. They emphasize that it's nearly fully customizable without addressing the implications of customizing everything and the fact that it's virtually impossible for them to test the functionality of all of these customizations from practice to practice. We were promised many things during our build out phase and pre-launch, only to find out after we went live that a lot of these features didn't actually function the way that they indicated they would, had ongoing issues, had intermittent functionality without any resolution, or just simply did not work
I haven't had to call too many times to get help with Office Ally but when I have had to call, I haven't always had the best customer service. It seems that I am bugging the person I reach when I call for technical support because I'm usually reminded that there are videos to watch for technical support help. On the flip side, there have been times that I called for help and was treated how you assume you'll be treated when you call for help - with grace, dignity, professionalism, and respect.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Every call is capped at 15 to 30 minutes, and if the issue isn't fixed in that window, the fix is to reschedule another 15-to-30-minute call rather than escalate or extend the session. That loop can, and does, repeat indefinitely. We've had our core eligibility issue open since March 16, 2026 with a second formal case open since April 9, 2026 specifically for the batch eligibility failures, and neither has produced a resolution in over four months. We have submitted more than 40 attachments to tech support on this single issue and sat through repeated calls with both InSync support and Inovalon directly. Support has stayed engaged in the sense of taking more calls and opening more tickets, but not in the sense of ever fixing anything or committing to a resolution date. When we escalated in writing, requesting a credit and a named owner for the fix, and looped in both our account manager and finance in the first week of July, we got no response at all, written or otherwise. The pattern across every support interaction is the same: acknowledge the ticket, burn a short call, reschedule, repeat, with no accountability if the deadline slips because there's never a real deadline set in the first place. For a platform handling billing, eligibility, and clinical documentation, that level of support is not adequate for the stakes involved.
I used to use Best Notes. Best Notes was difficult to navigate and very inflexible. We used it in the early time of EHR/EMR, so that the software was not very useful. When I changed to Office Ally, we are so delighted to change it because again it is easily to navigate the software. There is minimum of learning curve than other software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
NO MORE "CIRCLE OF DEATH"!!!!!!!!!!!!! No need to find "workarounds" for everyday tasks. No more need to scan and upload paper documents! Billing is much clearer. Claims and statements are easy to monitor. [Insync Healthcare Solutions] has listened [to] its clients and built a system that caters to all!!!!!!! No regrets with our decision to go with [Insync Healthcare Solutions]!!!!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We love the ease of use, it really creates a smooth process between departments.
We have had some issues with the billing, but it is partially staffing and partially training- we are still working with our staff and our representative from Insync to fix these errors, so it is difficult to put the blame on Insync [Healthcare Solutions]. I believe some of it is user error.
The conflicting information we receive from Insync support has created a lot of issues in the billing department. I would like more consistency from their support team, as I have witnessed two people ask the same question, and get a completely different answer. Again, this could be a user error contributing to the confusion, but consistent responses would be helpful to solve the issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
