OnContact was customer relationship management software for sales and marketing automation, available through either cloud or on-premise deployment. It was acquired by Workwise LLC, which was in turn acquired by Aptean, and is no longer available for sale.
N/A
Workamajig
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
Workamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
Workamajig
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
Workamajig
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
5.0
2 Ratings
44% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
4.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
4.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
4.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
5.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
3.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quote & order management
3.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
4.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
4.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
3.6
2 Ratings
73% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Case management
5.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
4.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
8.5
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
9.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Task management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
8.7
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
4.9
2 Ratings
44% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Custom fields
4.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
4.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
3.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
10.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
7.0
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Social data
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
7.0
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Mobile access
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Feature
Oncontact CRM (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.16 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Oncontact CRM (discontinued) and Workamajig
Oncontact is an excellent software/service, and it covers a tremendous breadth of usage scenarios. The customization means that customers can adapt it as they see fit. About the only place where I don't see it as a great fit is in minimal implementations. A lot is going on, and using it for small tasks isn't the best use of the software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The company has been using Oncontact for some time now. Many of the business processes require the use of a CRM software package. It helps solve some pretty serious problems, and overall the cost is very justified. Also, the developer is very good at keeping it up to date and introducing new functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oncontact provided many, but not all of the features of Salesforce.com. However, the complexity and cost involved in Salesforce.com was an overriding factor for us to use Oncontact. Not just the initial and licensing fee, but it seemed that just about everything we wanted to do involved consultants or more work or licensing. Oncontact was easier to implement out of the box, even when we did need to make customizations.
We looked at Microsoft 365 Business, and while it was comparable in price for the initial cost, the integration with our other software systems was not built-in, so we did not pursue it very much.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info