TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Documentum vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A

    LoadRunner Professional

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AA solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Documentum and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of OpenText Documentum and OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText LoadRunner Professional
    8.4
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    End to end performance management00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Integrated performance data00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Real time monitoring00 Ratings6.15 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    JMeter
    Score8.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText DocumentumLoadRunner Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
    • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
    • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
    • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
    • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
    • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
    • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots