OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ProcessMaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Operations Orchestration
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText™ Operations Orchestration automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automations use low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrations are done with an API-rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrates workflows.N/A
ProcessMaker
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Features
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Operations Orchestration
9.5
2 Ratings
14% above category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Operations Orchestration
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
7.8
3 Ratings
7% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Operations Orchestration
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.6
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.911 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Operations Orchestration
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.9
10 Ratings
22% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings8.38 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings8.38 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Operations Orchestration
-
Ratings
ProcessMaker
8.1
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Business Process Modeling00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Decision Modeling00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Code-Based Automation00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
No-Code Automation00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Control-M
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.9
(11 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Operations OrchestrationProcessMaker
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
The products are being paired by the company with different software to specifically fit multiple scenarios. As a standalone platform, it can answer any task with its build-in content or the ability to create your own content and solution.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Allows for the quick disconnection of accounts that break our terms of service
  • Seamless integration with our billing system
  • Has the ability to house all member/client account information in one single location
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
  • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
  • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The product build in portal need to be more flexible
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Most product works well enough, but none of them combine the non-agent/client approach to automation with an easy to develop mechanism (the drag&drop development approach) This alone put this solution on top of our preferred implantation product list
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ProcessMaker Inc.
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • If time is money, the time saved by using this all-in-one product has certainly saved time AND money.
Read full review
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Read full review
ScreenShots