Oracle Hyperion (legacy) vs. Vena

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Pricing
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Considered Both Products
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion was easier to use and learn and problem solve issues than Oracle Financials
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Compared with some of the other products that had been used, Oracle Hyperion had solved the major impediment of integrating multiple ERP systems (both SAP and non-SAP) with relative ease while providing the business the leverage to analyze, comprehend, and rectify the data.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion makes it easier to create reports based on the data available on Hyperion. However is Phocas is better for drilling down information and it is also much more mobile.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
None of the other products used or evaluated are available for me to select.
I have used EPMware with is a competing software to DRM. I find the ROI on this tool greater then DRM. It is about a quarter of the cost and directly interfaces with multiple Hyperion applications.
CXO …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product.
Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
It is the leading system, with the most power and flexibility of any of these. It is also the most expensive. Berkeley needs the best possible tool for this job. Questica and Workday cannot handle the number of dimensions we use. Adaptive might be a good competitor but since I …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We utilize Tableau as well for reporting, but the good thing about OracleHyperion Enterprise Performance Management is it is in sync with our ledger as we utilize Oracle Ledger from our side. Tableau has a better user interface but the EPM's understanding of the data makes it …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
When we were trying to decide between Oracle Hyperion and SAP BPC, the cost and functionality were pretty much the same between both products, but we decided for the Oracle solution as it was better positioned in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for consolidation softwares, and some …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Due to being the industry forefront and owned by Oracle
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Oracle has led the charge on the development of true EPM reporting. The development of rudimentary KPIs to much more complex models all can be housed and managed by Hyperion. Integrates with Office through Smartview, which provides flexibility in creating Word documents, board …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We also took a look to Cognos, but since we have Oracle eBS as our main ERP, we decided without a very deep analysis.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
In our review, Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management stacks up pretty well against SAP Business Warehouse. The most glaring area was cost. For a product capable of the same level of reporting day in and day out, Hyperion offered the best bang for the buck. This …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Toyota has a global presence and deals with different countries and different currencies. To manage finance, this tool is the most reliable tool I found if the company has a global presence. If you deal with any tool to manage Financial matters, performance and reliability is …
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Pricing is one factor and the features offered by the Oracle EPM and IBM cognos shifted the favour in terms of Oracle EPM.
Chose Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
We have evaluated other options in the past, and we are currently re-evaluating some of the SaaS providers due to the increased strength of those products over the last few years. However, our biggest need continues to be a very capable consolidation tool as we are …
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena is much more user friendly but Python does allow for more custom reporting
Chose Vena
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining …
Chose Vena
We went with Vena as the alternatives felt like everything was contained in the box, and would have required more IT department assistance than we had bandwidth for.
Chose Vena
Vena is much better for customization and data representation. It gives us much more flexibility in how we show our information to stakeholders. We need our information to be digestible for non-financial employees, and with that flexibility to show things how we want, we are …
Chose Vena
we did our diligence when selecting Vena. I do not want to disparage other products so I will not list them. However, we were extremely thorough and gauged all offerings on multiple criteria. Big players and small players. We are very happy with our Decision to go with Vena.
Chose Vena
Oracle is more clunky and prone to stats breaking while Vena is more streamlined.
Chose Vena
Solver was more user friendly in the report building, but Vena has more functionalities
Chose Vena
My experience was that OneStream lacked driver-based planning. I still had to build models in excel and then upload my numbers into OneStream.
Chose Vena
Vena was much easier to implement, and more user friendly
Chose Vena
Vena has a much more arsenal of AI features.
Chose Vena
we liked that Vena was fully integrated into Excel and we were already doing all our manual work within excel and creating all our reports and templates so we thought that only made sense to use Vena as it was most comfortable for us
Chose Vena
We selected Vena due to it being Excel based.
Chose Vena
I think from the finance perspective specifically, Vena is more clear and easy to read. Besides, the report that Vena generates is more reliable and realistic in our case. But we do integrate the data from Workday to Vena every month. So we use the both platforms for our …
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because the product worked in Excel, so there was less of a training curve for people, because all of other people work with cell users and we also chose it better because of the people, the sales reps, and the implementation teams. You know, the processes that …
Chose Vena
Vena is Excel-based, which is what our users wanted. Pigment was web-based, like Adaptive, but our users did not fully trust or adopt it. Adoption drives success for any software. Amy's software, which is not adopted, has a negative ROI by definition. Vena was the right choice …
Chose Vena
Playful is complex and not user friendly. There was no customer support so we had to pay a third party consultant and it was expensive
Chose Vena
Vena has more capabilities that we saw during demos
Chose Vena
The main reason was because Vena was Excel based and would allow us to replicate our budget templates and limit the change management for our users
Chose Vena
Vena is more customizable in my opinion
Features
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial budgeting10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Forecasting10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Scenario modeling10.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Management reporting10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
8.2
Ratings
0% above category average
Vena
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.10 Ratings9.10 Ratings
KPIs9.90 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data6.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
Ratings
4% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Vena
8.1
Ratings
0% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)Vena
Likelihood to Recommend
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
Read full review
It’s great for achieving flexible outcomes amid ever-changing desires among its user base. We have not implemented AI into our finances quite yet, but this seems very promising for working more efficiently in analysis and narrative prep. It works great for constant real-time data and allows us to make decisions on the fly.
Read full review
Pros
  • HFM is very powerful for financial consolidations .
  • Hyperion Planning is used to project accurate planning and thus provide the benefit to organization to do allocations and driver based planning so that it can justify the numbers based on headcount, number of stops & Revenue and thus provide valuable projections and thus help reduce the expenses.
  • Essbase is powerful engine helps provide analytical adhoc reporting for financial users . Performance of reporting and ease of use helps excellent customers experience when doing adhoc analysis.
Read full review
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
Cons
  • Oracle Hyperion requires a lot of knowledge and expertise to be successful.
  • The underlying infrastructure of Oracle Hyperion is complex and can be difficult to implement.
  • Some of the Oracle Hyperion application servers only run on Windows. Windows can sometimes be unstable.
  • Oracle Hyperion application server processes are dependent on each other and need to be started in a specific order. Therefore, if certain services die on one server, it could require all services/processes in the entire Hyperion landscape to be restarted in the correct order.
Read full review
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
Read full review
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
Support Rating
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
Read full review
Their general support is pretty responsive (max 24 hours) but when you work directly through one of their CSMs then the response time can be much faster. If you purchase coaching hours then you can get things sorted out pretty quick. Over time you learn the software and need support less, but it's always helpful to have it ready when you need it
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hyperion is easy to implement and maintain, low cost of ownership is also a great reason to select this product. Oracle's investment to keep the product innovations and improvements over the years is well appreciated by the users. The ease of managing integration with different business systems is also considered while selecting this product.
Read full review
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis by centralizing information and improving collaboration.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We had to get the planning application designed correctly before we got a good ROI, but once we did it became well liked and highly utilized.
  • It has had a very positive overall impact on increasing finance literacy across campus, allowing units a better insight into their revenues and expenses and the overall planning process.
  • It has been an essential tool during a time where the campus needed to reduce it's budget by over 100 million dollars annually. Without this product, we would not have a way to identify, track and report on our progress reducing the budget.
Read full review
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard