Oracle Java SE Subscription vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Oracle Java SE Subscription | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle Java SE Subscription combines license and support into a subscription to enable users to manage Java SE installations, updates and upgrades across the enterprise. The former Java SE Advanced, Java SE Advanced Desktop, and Java SE Suite products have transitioned to a Java SE Subscriptions. Beyond the unlicensed version, purchasers of Oracle Java SE Subscription receive all-hours access to My Oracle Support, enterprise monitoring, management, and deployment features, and early access to… | $2.50 per named user per month |
Progress Telerik | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Oracle Java SE Subscription | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Volume discounts also available. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Oracle Java SE Subscription | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
93% Would buy again 63 Answers | 97% Would buy again 28 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
92% Delivers good value for the price 60 Answers | 92% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 64 Answers | 97% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 42 Answers | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
98% Implementation went as expected 61 Answers | 96% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Oracle Java SE Subscription | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | GraalVM Score9.1 out of 10 | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle Java SE Score8.1 out of 10 | D3.js Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | GraalVM Score9.1 out of 10 | Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Oracle Java SE Subscription | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.2 | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Oracle Java SE Subscription | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |








