The PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform is a talent management platform designed for Higher Education and Government organizations, now from PowerSchool (acquired August, 2018). Modules include analytics, applicant tracking, position management, onboarding, records management, and performance management.
N/A
Sakai
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Sakai is an open source learning
management system provided by the Apero Foundation. The LMS provides what it
calls Core and Expanded Features. The Core Features encompass an integrated
tool set that is tested by the Sakai community members and is then included
with each new release. The tool set can be configured by: instructors,
students, research investigators and project leaders. The other set of tools, known as “Contrib
Tools” are specific to Sakai tools and innovations that are developed…
N/A
Pricing
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Sakai
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Sakai
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Must contact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Sakai
Features
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
Sakai
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.7
8 Ratings
6% above category average
Sakai
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
5.8
3 Ratings
23% below category average
Sakai
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
2.7
3 Ratings
87% below category average
Sakai
-
Ratings
Performance plans
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Sakai
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
PeopleAdmin Higher Ed Platform, from Powerschool
7.3
3 Ratings
3% above category average
Sakai
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
8.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
8.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Organizations who have very few applications and/or very few positions posted are probably less likely to benefit as high from PeopleAdmin. Large organizations who have several positions and/or several applications/applicants can definitely benefit from this product. This product is not as well suited for performance management as I had hoped because there is not a lot of freedom to creating and designing different evaluations for different position types in the system when you have an organization that has thousands of different employees and types.
I've used Sakai to supplement my Public Speaking class. Public Speaking is very much a F2F type course, so I didn't use Sakai much for course content delivery. However, I did use it to post my syllabus, post my lecture slides, communicate any class announcements, and to conduct a final exam for the class. Building the final exam was very simple and I was easily able to swap out questions to vary it from term to term. Before I was a staff member and lecturer, I used Sakai as a student. My instructor used Sakai to varying degrees. I really appreciated it being the one-stop-receptacle for all-things class related. If I somehow lost an assignment instruction sheet, I could rely on it being posted there. For multimedia work it was lacking, at that time, but I know Sakai has been updated over time and I hope that part of it has improved. If I was ever frustrated by Sakai, it was because faculty used it in a piecemeal way. It's fine not to want to use the gradebook, but don't enter some grades and not others. It's wonderful to upload class documents to it; but don't do some and not others. Whatever way you're going to use Sakai, commit to it and use it well. Your students will thank you.
Applicant tracking was a good use of this tool for our department. I think it could use a few more customization features but overall it was a good tool to weed out applicants who were not qualified for the position.
The system has some canned reporting tools that also worked well for our department and management needs.
It was a great place to house our position descriptions and provided a readily accessible source for hiring managers to make requested updates and changes and for employees to see and have access to their position descriptions.
Sakai is flexible, providing a way for our customers (instructors) to customize their courses while staying in line with consistency and continuity of course design. This has allowed our courses to be far less cookie-cutter and stale. This is mostly accomplished through Sakai's LTI functionality and it's Lessons tool. This is particularly notable because not every course is the same, nor should it be. Our faculty and course developers can draw from OER resources, course text publisher assessment quiz banks and pull in content from sources from our library databases and services like YouTube.
Sakai is customizable, allowing us to pair it with our student information system to automatically create and track with student registration data - including adding new students and removing students who have elected to drop a course. The customization features also include being able to create course templates for individual schools or courses using specific tools or sequences of tools as well as a way to personalize content for students when they engage with each lesson.
Sakai is stable in the market. We have been using Sakai for almost 10 years and continue to see it improve; responding to changing trends in browser technologies, mobile platforms and accessibility requirements. Multiple programs offered over the years have been recognized by outside organizations like BestColleges.com for our programs and given high marks by students taking the courses offered in Sakai.
Sakai allows our faculty to inform it's continued evolution. We work closely with the developers, having a front seat to how things can work and function for our faculty. There have been multiple occasions where faculty ask, "Can Sakai do this?" and the answer is never "No."
PeopleAdmin's internal report writer needs work. Currently, in version 7, reporting can only be done requisition number by requisition number. The report writer needs to be modified so it can create reports enterprise-wide.
PeopleAdmin's Data Mart product needs substantial modification. In version 5.8, on a monthly basis, PeopleAdmin provided us with an Microsoft Access database containing our historical data up to that period end. In version 7, the "Data Mart" contains our historical data. The Data Mart consists of over 300 files. These files are not database table downloads nor is it parts of a database data dump. Rather, the files appear to be scrapes from html pages. They contain html codes and other character data that needs to be cleaned before they can be uploaded. The files are not in a table-by-table format. Any one file can contain data from two or more tables. The format of the Data Mart makes it difficult to load the data into a database and format it in a table structure that is comparable to the Access database provided with version 5.8.
We are evaluating our options as it relates to PeopleAdmin. We are likely to renew as we can not find another product that gives us the functionality we have with PeopleAdmin 5.8 in the area of Position Description. Outside of that, we would likely be close to finding another product solution.
Sakai is a good general learning management system - it is not leading edge but rather a stable system with standard learning management system features. It can be fairly easily customized and is fairly easy to learn from both student learning and faculty administrative vantage points. New paradigms for online learning though are emergent so the current field should also be investigated with competitors.
When faculty are preparing courses from term to term, a portion of the content is static within a specific discipline. The time it takes to import past lessons into new versions of Sakai can be an inefficient use of my time. When I want to add new content and edit from the old content, it's reliant upon me to cut and paste the content from term to term rather than simply import and edit from a backup.
Since Sakai is open-source their documentation is often lacking and support is absolutely needed onsite. Internal documentation is more important with Sakai than other services. The Sakai community is fun, passionate, engaged, and absolutely doing their best, but it's an uphill battle against the current market and trends.
I've used both Target Recruit and HR Smart. When working with Target Recruit it quickly became apparent it was not the right solution for us. Another solution we examined prior to selection PeopleAdmin was iCIMS. iCIMS is a very social system but was not as familiar with the Higher Education recruitment processes as was PeopleAdmin.
As an adjunct professor, I didn't pick Sakai for the university. I have experience with Moodle, Blackboard, eCollege, iBoard and now Sakai. I would have to say that Sakai is one of my all time favorite LMSs to use as it is very easy to navigate.
Sakai makes it easy for students to monitor grades which puts their minds at ease.
Sakai makes it easy for teachers to assign and receive assignments from students.
Communication is one of the most important and one of the most taxing parts of an educational system. Sakai makes this process just a little bit easier.