PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Weekdone
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Weekdone is software built around the best practices of the OKR goal-setting methodology and with an aim to speed up teams’ OKR learning curve, by providing high-quality educational materials and team-tailored OKR coaching throughout the implementation process. Weekdone is headquartered in Tartu, Estonia.
$0
Pricing
PeopleFluent
Weekdone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Up to 3 users
$0
Up to 10 users
$108
per month
Up to 15 users
$162
per month
Up to 20 users
$192
per month
Up to 30 users
$288
per month
Up to 40 users
$336
per month
Up to 50 users
$420
per month
Up to 60 users
$432
per month
Up to 70 users
$504
per month
Up to 500 users
$2,100
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleFluent
Weekdone
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleFluent
Weekdone
Features
PeopleFluent
Weekdone
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
9% above category average
Weekdone
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
12% above category average
Weekdone
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Weekdone
-
Ratings
Performance plans
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
4.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
9% below category average
Weekdone
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
27% above category average
Weekdone
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
User setup and management and team/department creation is not a trivial effort. Requires some deliberate planning.
The deadlines for plans don't connect to the due dates for tasks in systems of record. That can get confusing when Asana says a task is due next week but Weekdone still has a due date of tomorrow.
I'd love to see more contextual support for sections like employee feedback. Maybe a sentence or two suggesting feedback based on the report's weekly entry. If a person had three Problems and only one Progress, Weekdone could suggest some corrective action to make it easier for the management to mitigate problems before they get ugly.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
We have a lunch and learn session with Weekdone next week so they can share their tips and tricks for making the most out of the platform. Since we have been using the platform for a while already, this will be helpful so we can ensure we are making the most of the tool.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
Weekdone started as a pilot within a single team so we didn't have a formal evaluation and selection process. When the pilot was over, we had developed a skill and affinity for the tool with no clear objections, so no other tools were considered. Our process for regular evaluation of incumbent technology at renewal time asks us to consider the cost to value ratio and user adoption/satisfaction. I don't anticipate there being any reason to consider alternatives, other than the long term viability of small software companies.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.
Using Weekdone has helped us meet our quarterly business objectives by tracking each employee's progress.
We have been able to shift resources based on the progress tracked in Weekdone. If we find that a particular project is taking too long or costing too much, we are able to evaluate as needed. We were not able to see this as easily without Weekdone.