Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Power Apps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
SAP Build
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
SAP Build is a business application development and automation solution with a comprehensive suite of low-code, pro-code, and generative AI tools. SAP Build is for developers, IT professionals, and business users/citizen developers who want to create and customize business applications.
$1.82
per month per user
Pricing
Power AppsSAP Build
Editions & Modules
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
$1.82
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
$15
per month per user
SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
$534
per month
SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
$534
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Power AppsSAP Build
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Power AppsSAP Build
Considered Both Products
Power Apps
Chose Power Apps
I rarely used Power BI as a stnd-alone dashboarding environment. However, I have to admit that it's a different purpose tool. I'd rather user Power BI layer as an addition to the low-code application and integrate it in the Power Apps. The latter does not seem to be as …
Chose Power Apps
Power Apps easily integrates with Power Automate and Logic Apps.
Chose Power Apps
Power Apps is great for rapid app development and internal business solutions. It helps build user-friendly applications quickly and is a great, cost-effective option for existing Microsoft customers like us. Even non-developers can get started on using Power Apps without much …
Chose Power Apps
I think Appian has all major features and my Manager gives this 2 tools to choose one from that. I found Power Apps is easy to learn and develop, but I feel Appian is realy complex. I strugles to learn something in Appian but that didn;t works well. Power Apps gives me …
Chose Power Apps
1. PowerApps functionality comes with E1 over E3 License without adding extra costs
2. For Nintex you pay (at the beginning) for each workflow, so my intention would be, to do no workflows to prevent additional costs, but I want a platform with a fair price that allows me to …
Chose Power Apps
Much cheaper, much more customizable, and easier to use. There is not much of a learning curve and the licensing cost is much cheaper. PowerApps does one thing very well, whereas other platforms are mediocre. There is much more customization possible for your in-house workflows …
Chose Power Apps
PowerApps includes several features and caters to several business needs. Bubble is not Microsoft, people using PowerApps find it convenient since they are already committed to Office 365.
Chose Power Apps
PowerApps and Power Automate go together in the Power platform. They are made to work together to create a vast collection of connectors and out of the box pieces that come together to make a whole application. If you are unable to complete a task from within PowerApps, Power …
Chose Power Apps
I have extensive experience with another low code platform, K2 and it's SmartForms. SmartForms have their own challenges but allow the developer to extend the operation of a form as needed. In addition, their vNext version promises to greatly enhance the developer and …
Chose Power Apps
PowerApps is the first we have used in Office 365 and Azure Integration. It really helped us to integrate application in Azure and building short apps with low cost.
Chose Power Apps
PowerApps has much power when talking about Office 365 and Azure integrations. Has low cost and it is easy to create/deploy applications. Bonita is open-source but it is necessary to have many technical skills to create applications and also to handle the infrastructure when …
Chose Power Apps
I'm not sure if you can say D365 CRM is an alternative to PowerApps, because basically all the customization of using D365 CRM, or what used to be called XRM, is now called a model-driven PowerApp. Likewise, SharePoint has become intimately connected to canvas PowerApps. Both …
Chose Power Apps
PowerApps is what the company has presented to us as our option. While Nintex is nice and relatively capable, it is always a +1 to the Microsoft platform and requires its own validation and integration. Nintex can also be feature limited in its online version depending on the …
Chose Power Apps
It's by far the most superior simply because of its integration with what most companies already have in place Sharepoint, SQL, Azure. It's drag and drop functionality is top notch and the dream of creating mobile apps without having to duplicate the work is amazing as well. …
Chose Power Apps
I have not found another product Like PowerApps that is available to me.
Chose Power Apps
Along with PowerApps we evaluated Smartsheet for use and we determined that PowerApps provides a great deal more functionality and flexibility. Especially when you consider it is nested in SparePoint and all the additional functionality that SharePoint provides. PowerApps …
Chose Power Apps
Although Zoho allowed for some unique customization abilities including html styling and simple scripting language. In the end it came down to the Office 365 and choice of many other connections that lead me to choose PowerApps.
SAP Build
Chose SAP Build
we selected SAP Build because we came to know in one of SAP workshop with demo. we feel that it will be good tool to automate business process
Chose SAP Build
Vibe coding is going to replace tools like SAP Build in the near future.
Chose SAP Build
No i have not used any similar products
Chose SAP Build
We evaluated SAP Build alongside other low-code platforms, and one of the biggest advantages of SAP Build was its native integration with SAP applications such as SAP S/4HANA and other SAP services.Compared to alternatives, SAP Build provided a more seamless experience for …
Chose SAP Build
Easy and seamless connectivity with SAP data is the major contributor to select SAP Build against other.
Chose SAP Build
Microsoft Power Apps comes with ready template for invoice automation which means it is easy to implement such application. SAP Build was selected because of the tight integration to S/4HANA.
Chose SAP Build
SAP build holds upper hand for seamless integration of SAP S/4HANA system with SAP Build app. Process automation is better than .net functionality. No need for any functionality and prior coding knowledge in case of SAP Build App. It is very user friendly and applications …
Chose SAP Build
Seamlessly connected to SAP S4 Hana systems and development and deployment is easy as compared to Microsoft visual studio. Low code no code facility is awesome in SAP Build app where as in Visual studio drag and drop of components is provided but still needs to write bulky code …
Chose SAP Build
SAP Build is always good for a consultant from development background.
Chose SAP Build
SAP Build helped more on automating our complex and regular tasks and processes which helped us in saving time and less human errors in our critical processes
Chose SAP Build
SAP build solves the business need to automate approvals and tasks.
Reduce spreadsheet and email dependency. SAP build reduces manual work and improves efficiency. Faster delivery, Easy SAP data connections. Fast changes and deployment. Lower dependency on IT. It enables …
Chose SAP Build
Did not evaluate any other apps. Decided to go with SAP Build apps as its part of the SAP BTP echo system
Chose SAP Build
Joule helps the users now with natural language users can build UI applications.

With Datasphere we can analyse data and maintain it.
Chose SAP Build
the UI enhancement is more and the integration capability are too good
Chose SAP Build
SAP Build makes it easy with no code development. Azure has similar product but their security set up is a nightmare.
Chose SAP Build
We haven't used or evaluated other products, we stick to the SAP ecosystem and are long term SAP BTP users (8+ years).
Features
Power AppsSAP Build
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Power Apps
7.8
Ratings
7% below category average
SAP Build
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Visual Modeling7.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces7.60 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Platform Security8.60 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Platform User Management8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reusability7.40 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Platform Scalability7.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Power AppsSAP Build
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Power AppsSAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Power AppsSAP Build
Likelihood to Recommend
PowerApps is well suited for "quick-wins" and fast prototypes of business solutions. It also is beneficial for situations where business partners and developers work together - it allows the business folks to provide a "quick-and-dirty" prototype which is then fleshed-out by developers that are trained experts on the platform. The interactive and easy to understand representation of the solution allows business partners to "see" the solution and add, remove, or correct aspects of it themselves. It provides a common view and understanding of the actual solution across business units and tech teams. PowerApps, being a low-code\no-code platform is not well suited for business processes that require many complex computations or large amounts of custom code - such as solutions that are better architected as Web Site or "full-blown" desktop solutions. There are solutions that are just not easy or quick to accomplish in a low-code\no-code platform. Enterprise Architects should know the difference, however business partners often try to create a solution and only when stuck because it becomes too complex do they engage a tech team for assistance - at which point there are sunk-costs involved and hinderences to re-platforming the solution
Read full review
SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.
Read full review
Pros
  • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
  • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
  • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
Read full review
  • SAP Build Workzone is a cloud ready service that it can provide access to users over cloud. It really liked it because for Non-SAP users they don't need to have seperate logins to access SAP systems
  • SAP Build LCNC helps to create an app either from scratch or take reference from existing apps and develop on top of it
  • SAP Build Code is pro-developer tool helps for creating enterprise ready web apps
Read full review
Cons
  • More complicated to understand in comparison with Nintex Forms.
  • Complicated to find errors.
  • Using PowerApps for SharePoint Forms is a bit complicated by setting up the start and load scenario with a lot of JavaScript.
  • Load values, change them by code, and save them back could be easier. Actually quite complicated to handle a lot of variables.
Read full review
  • Comparing to other RPA Tools, SAP Build automation lacks enough user guidance.
  • Licensing is a little bit confusing.
  • From a technical perspective, older versions of the automation part are not always stable, but the other services (workflow, business rules, apps, etc.) are much more stable.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
SAP Build that enables rapid creation of enterprise-grade applications, automations, and business sites. It empowers both business users and developers to collaborate effectively while leveraging SAP-grade security, identity, and integration capabilities. SAP Build integrates seamlessly with SAP systems, supports governance and lifecycle management, and accelerates digital transformation by reducing development time and effort.
Read full review
Usability
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Read full review
It offers a user friendly low-code interface with easily drag and drop feature that make application accessible to both developers and users. The UI interface for building flows , designing interface and connecting with other SAP services. This platform enables quick development and quick proto-type and process automation. But, some advanced feature like complex integration may need deeper knowledge in that.
Read full review
Support Rating
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
Read full review
There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Online training helped to understand the drag and drop processes, building UI. Creating a workflow and process automation. Developing workflow and deploying WF. Helped to reduce the errors. It helped to understand the training easily. And online training gave good insights for low code no code solutions and create actions, forms.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Yes we are implementing a custom solution of Customer PO on sap build code and BPA
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Power Apps is great for rapid app development and internal business solutions. It helps build user-friendly applications quickly and is a great, cost-effective option for existing Microsoft customers like us. Even non-developers can get started on using Power Apps without much difficulty. Power Apps is ideal for scenarios with limited customization and works well for reusing simpler applications. Power Apps is the go-to choice for empowering business users.
Read full review
SAP build holds upper hand for seamless integration of SAP S/4HANA system with SAP Build app. Process automation is better than .net functionality. No need for any functionality and prior coding knowledge in case of SAP Build App. It is very user friendly and applications developed are also user friendly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Automation of manual processes brings an ROI on labor costs.
  • Intake of data provides clean database design.
  • Connectivity to data-lake provides insights and trends into the data.
  • Able to scale operations with efficiencies provided by the app.
  • Can mature the process and workflows to do more.
Read full review
  • SAP Build apps has a high ROI. Development is fast and cloud pricing is good.
  • Business objectives are handled better than any other solution for custom app development in the SAP ecosystem.
  • Process Automation workflows are very fast to develop, mostly graphically, and work very well.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Build Screenshots

Screenshot of the SAP Build Portfolio, which includes:
1- SAP Build Apps to create business application
2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes
3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites