| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | N/A | Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response… | N/A | |
 Sophos Intercept X | N/A | Sophos Endpoint Protection (Sophos EPP) with Intercept X is an endpoint security product providing an antivirus / antimalware solution that when upgraded with Intercept X or Intercept X Advanced provides advanced threat detection and EDR capabilities. | $28 per year per user |
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Pricing is for a 3-year commitment. Government and Education pricing available. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products |  Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull  Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull TRAP had fewer false positives and caught more malicious emails. With the host of companion products, it was more complete package. It gives us the ability to pull emails using an admin-submitted CVS file of emails to pull. EOP does not have this capability.  Fraser Clark Network Engineer Chose Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull I have not evaluated any other products against TRAP. |  Sophos Intercept X  William Scott Coates IT Support Specialist Chose Sophos Intercept X Webroot endpoint protection is not even in the same league as Sophos Intercept-X. I have tested and compared both sides by side, run simulations and it's not even close. Plus the Sophos central management is so much better. Easier to view user activities and apply policies and … Chose Sophos Intercept X We have used Avast, AVG, Panda, Sophos' original antivirus product, and Symantec before and it is better than each of them. The cloud console is the star of the show and it dramatically reduces the cost and effort needed to install the product. Other products were only …  Reginald Johnson Managing Consultant - DevOps Chose Sophos Intercept X It is one of the only products that will scan all code in memory and arbitrary data for malicious behaviors.  Shawn Umansky Network Engineer Chose Sophos Intercept X We have been using this product for a number of years, which shows that it has worked well for us. I don't recall the other products we reviewed.  Ramon Vazquez IT Director Chose Sophos Intercept X It provides more features for the same price. These added features differentiate Sophos from the rest of the pack, making it a better solution. Also, the ability to integrate with your Sophos firewall if you have one adds another level of integration and protection. This … Chose Sophos Intercept X Sophos Intercept X is just easier to implement and manage.  Steven Hiersche, Jr. Director Of Information Technology Chose Sophos Intercept X We didn’t evaluate any other products. I used Sophos at a previous company and when I started here, they were using the on-prem version. We immediately migrated to central and haven’t looked back. I am aware of the competitors, but once you are comfortable with a quality …  Jane Updegraff Senior Systems Administrator Chose Sophos Intercept X Sophos Intercept X is a little less expensive than the comparable package from Trend Micro and a little more expensive than a comparable package from Symantec, but in my opinion, it's easier to operate and it's got better centralized controls than both of the others. But the …  Thayer Ramahi Director, IMIT Chose Sophos Intercept X We found Sophos is a full suit in one, easy to deploy, manage and very effective.  Neil Taylor Trade Floor Infrastructure Manager Chose Sophos Intercept X Sophos is by far the simplest of the products to setup and going in a very short period of time at a very similar price point. Trend is overly complex and relied on an appliance for each ESX node meaning you lose one appliance and then you lose protection across multiple …  Eric V. Zarghami Deputy CIO Chose Sophos Intercept X Besides legacy malware protection, Sophos is doing a good job in protecting against ransomware, thanks to their Intercept X and its behavioral analytics that would stop ransomware that was never seen in wild.  Alex Farling Managing Partner Chose Sophos Intercept X Best in class... PERIOD... Bit Defender is a good AV product by itself, but it lacks in Next Gen Heuristic detection. It has allowed malware to get past it in our client environments, even with Admin permissions restricted. Sophos is hands down a superior product when paired …  Ryhlen Schoeberl Server Administrator Chose Sophos Intercept X Sophos I feel is a better product upon installation we had a few systems that reported threats that ESET did not catch. Sophos also has multiple other products that we were able to bundle together and still have one interface to do. Intercept X, Endpoint Protection, and …  Jon Shurtliff Vice President of Information Technology Chose Sophos Intercept X In our analysis we discovered that for the price and feature set, Sophos was able to rise above the rest. Pricing is always a large consideration, however it isn't the only consideration - the feature set that Sophos Endpoint Protection provided over its competitors made the … |
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident Response Platforms |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
|
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 9.7 out of 10 |  ThreatLocker Score 9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 |  BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 |  BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 10.0 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (0 ratings) | 8.2 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 9.0 (0 ratings) | 8.2 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 9.0 (0 ratings) | 8.1 (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (0 ratings) |
| Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull | Sophos Intercept X | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
William Scott Coates IT Support Specialist |
| Pros |
|
Jane Updegraff Senior Systems Administrator |
| Cons |
Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Ryhlen Schoeberl Server Administrator |
| Usability |
Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst |
|
| Support Rating |
Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
Ryhlen Schoeberl Server Administrator |
| Alternatives Considered |
Chris Bash IS Systems Analyst |
|
| Return on Investment |
Fraser Clark Network Engineer |
|
| ScreenShots | Sophos Intercept X Screenshots   |
