Qubit OpenTag vs. SugarSync

Pros: Easy tagging process, custom alerts, and Notifications, KPIs dashboard, Marketing operations alignment. Cons: Could use some improvement around the custom export options for data visualization.

Incentivized

When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.

Incentivized

• Deploy/disable pixels to production on demand
• Be able to control pixel position and firing criteria
• Use a directory of third party vendors which makes it even faster

Incentivized

• Sync files in any folder - rather than forcing you to store them in a certain place (Although this can be confusing too)
• Works in the background - although this is true for all
• You can share with others - including those who do not use SugarSync

Incentivized

• Being able to preview in the same way Qubit Deliver experiments can be previewed would be a great feature before publishing changes.

Incentivized

• Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.

Incentivized

Qubit has supported us with our business goals and continues to do so.

1. Freemium model is the ideal marketing for an app like this. 2. Now their sync methods with Android are worse

Easy to set up and integrate with other tools, boosts efficiencies within the team, provides great insights, custom dashboards, and notifications.

Incentivized

Friendly and knowledgeable customer support team.

Incentivized

Customer service is amazing, they are always fast to respond and very helpful.

Incentivized

Qubit is much easier to use and select object vs. Google Tag Manager.

Incentivized

SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.

Incentivized

• One of the most obvious and beneficial features is the huge reduction in HTTP requests, giving us a great site performance benefit.
• Managing all of our tags in one place has removed a lot of potential complications.

Incentivized

• There were some opensource alternatives but we wanted something with better support which SugarSync offers.
• We achieved faster project collaboration with SugarSync.

Incentivized