SAP CPQ vs. Structured
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
Structured | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | An Enterprise-Grade Channel Marketing Automation Platform Structured provides prominent technology brands like AWS, IBM, ServiceNow, Google Cloud Platform and Veeam — along with many other growing brands — with a channel marketing automation platform. Since 1999, StructuredWeb has combined a platform with go-to-market strategies and services in order to deliver a better way to accelerate channel-driven demand generation, strengthen partner engagement and grow channel revenue. | N/A |
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 100% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 | Rithum Score6.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.5 | - |
| Usability | 7.8 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| SAP CPQ | Structured | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |








