| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Snagajob | Score6.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Snagajob, or Snag (including technology from PeopleMatter acquired June 2016) is a recruiting and job posting marketplace and platform, designed to fit the specific needs of service-industry brands. Users can find applicants, hire employees, train workers, schedule teams, and evaluate performance using the Snag / Snagajob platform. | N/A |
| Snagajob | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | PeopleMatter is priced per location per month. The pricing is consistent for predictable budgeting and planning – as customers add additional locations, fees increase. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| Snagajob | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Snagajob I've no evidence at this point to rate Snagajob (Snag) in relation to other such services. I do suppose it's a better experience than a previously mentioned competitor. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob I have used Indeed and Proven for hiring. Indeed is great, but Proven was more for corporate staff. I like Snag because it was developed for part to full-time service industry jobs. It has more people there for my company, where, with others, there are more professional or … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob PeopleMatter was selected primarily to support the store environment, and it does an excellent job in that space. It was chosen over other vendors for its easy to use, intuitive interface that really meets the needs of the manager in a retail store. The system helps managers … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob Honestly, the number one reason I choose PeopleMatter was the look and feel of the system. I needed something that was not intimidating to use. My restaurant managers do not have time to try and figure out how to use complicated systems. PeopleMatter had a familiar face to it, … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob [PeopleMatter] needs to be more HRIS system. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob Seriously, it's the onboarding that sets PeopleMatter apart from the rest. Every payroll company I have ever met with always says their service can work for what we need and replace PeopleMatter. However, they never can link our applications to their site, provide a way to … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob Previoulsy, we did everything in house before so PeopleMatter has been a time saver. I use to spend days just checking paperwork to make sure it was complete and then to verify applicants was a nightmare. PeopleMatter has simplified all of that and completely changed my work … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob We use both. PeopleMatter cannot create surveys so we do this outside of the system. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Snagajob PeopleMatter is straight forward and easy to use - from the administrative side it is virtually an out of the box process. You plug in your locations, jobs, and availabilities, know your Onboarding steps, add a link to your website an go! It's not perfect but this was our first … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
80% Would buy again 4 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 4 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Snagajob | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  LinkedIn Jobs Score7.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies |  Glassdoor Score7.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Handshake Talent Engagement Suite Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Snagajob | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 |
| Usability | 8.6 |
| Availability | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 4.7 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 |
| Snagajob | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | Snagajob Screenshots      |
