Socedo vs. X Pro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Socedo
Score 9.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
The Socedo platform provides automated social media lead generation at scale. Sales and marketing professionals use Socedo to find leads based on a targeted social buyer persona of keywords, hashtags, location, and real-time behavior. Socedo automatically initiates engagement with leads on Twitter through a light, medium, and heavy touch approach.
$100
per month
X Pro
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Replacing the former TweetDeck, X Pro is a social media dashboard application for management of Twitter accounts.N/A
Pricing
SocedoX Pro
Editions & Modules
Socedo
$100.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SocedoX Pro
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSocedo's cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) is priced on a subscription basis. The vendor offers pricing models for small, medium and larger enterprises. The rate is determined by a few factors: Number of prospects engaged with; Number of leads with corporate email addresses exported; Number of campaigns run; Integrations with CRM or Marketing Automation systems; Whether the organization utilizes the vendor's Managed Services. All packages come with a standard six months agreement. The vendor does charge a small, one-time onboarding fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SocedoX Pro
Best Alternatives
SocedoX Pro
Small Businesses
Growave
Growave
Score 9.7 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Echobox Social
Echobox Social
Score 9.8 out of 10
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Sprout Social
Sprout Social
Score 8.5 out of 10
Sprinklr Social
Sprinklr Social
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SocedoX Pro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(33 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(16 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
SocedoX Pro
Likelihood to Recommend
Socedo
Socedo is very well suited to B2C style businesses that want to grow their following on Twitter but in a targeted way. It is perfect for starting the conversation with those users and directing them to offers and/or gated content.
Read full review
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
TweetDeck is ideal for complex media organisations / newsrooms where you want to keep track of several users accounts, or switch between multiple user and/or title accounts. It is perfect for those who want to follow conversations in real-time via many channels, at a glance. It is also useful for those who want to schedule tweets to provide around the clock coverage even when unmanned. Now that it paid-for is less suited to smaller organisations with tight budgets.
Read full review
Pros
Socedo
  • Targeting the right Twitter followers.
  • Connecting with Twitter followers.
  • Engaging with your new followers.
Read full review
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
  • TweetDeck is the best platform to schedule tweets - it is far better than the website itself. The process is remarkably easy and scheduling a day's worth of tweets takes no more than 10 minutes.
  • Tracking news is very easy on TweetDeck due to being able to create multiple columns each focusing on a different subject. Columns can be created using handles, searches, hashtags, and trends, and this makes TweetDeck a great platform as a news editor.
Read full review
Cons
Socedo
  • The dashboard can be clunky.
  • Cost price is a little high for many.
Read full review
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
  • TweetDeck has an editing feature for scheduled posts only if there is no image attached. When a post with an image needs editing, users must instead delete the entire post and reschedule it with the edits needed.
  • TweetDeck has a real-time display, however users often need to refresh the window manually to get scheduled posts to appear in the appropriate column.
  • TweetDeck users can scroll side to side to view all off the types of columns selected. This functionality often leads to traveling back to a previous page unintentionally.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
As I previously mentioned, if TweetDeck were to increase some features and integrations, cleaned up its interface, and developed a tool to measure ROI, it would remain competitive with HootSuite and Hubspot. Altogether, it is an effective tool for the job of scheduling and monitoring your impact on Twitter, it falls behind other competitors that offer a more robust solution.
Read full review
Usability
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
It's a pretty easy tool to use I find a few of the columns to be a bit repetitive. If you are managing more than one account you'll start to find yourself having easily 10 plus columns all tracking all different information which creates nice track lanes to keep all that relative information in one column or "view". With the amount of data that is pushed out, if you are following a large number of accounts, it's extremely easy to lose valuable posts in your feeds. As you begin building out your columns they get the point where you only look at one or two and the rest seem to be lost. Overall, this a free tool and there are other social monitoring tools that are out there but are in the multiple thousands of dollar range
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
TweetDeck tends to be available for use majority of the time...however, I've had times where it would get stuck in a loop and then post my Tweet multiple times.
Read full review
Performance
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
Besides posting multiple times when stuck in a loop not other real issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
I've never had to contact customer support. Tweetdeck has always worked like a charm for me. And, if I have had a problem, I've simply deleted the column, then recreated it and it worked again. While it's not without its glitches every once in a great while, it's worked like a charm.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Socedo
No answers on this topic
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
Easy download and launch of application.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Socedo
Socedo differs from Narrow in that it requires manual approval of the accounts you wish to follow where Narrow is much more automated in its approach. Socedo also provides additional functionality that is lacking in Narrow with the automated messages that can also be A/B split tested.
Read full review
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
Several years ago I used the Hootsuite Free service. I found Tweetdeck to be preferable because of its user interface, and greater functionality. Moreover, I recall Hootsuite bombarding me with emails that were just irrelevant. TweetDeck just does what it does, without hassle. Its UI and functionality for multiple accounts seems to be the best I've tried.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Socedo
  • We have grown our Twitter followers significantly.
  • Socedo has directed a large number of our followers to our website so our traffic has increased.
Read full review
X Corp (formerly Twitter)
  • Positive: User-friendly and therefore easy to teach new members.
  • Positive: Easy team management (when there are multiple users/managers for one channel).
  • Positive impact on well being - You can take a break from social media and go on holiday even when you are working as a social media manager.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Socedo Screenshots

Screenshot of