Sophos UTM vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sophos UTM | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | Sophos UTM provides core firewall features, plus sandboxing and AI threat detection for advanced network security. It has customizable deployment options. | N/A |
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient. | N/A |
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | t2.small - $0.123 - Total / hr m3.medium - $0.417 - Total / hr m3.large - $0.883 - Total / hr m3.xlarge - $1.366 - Total / hr m3.2xlarge- $1.982 - Total / hr c3.large - $0.555 - Total / hr c3.xlarge - $1.11 - Total / hr c3.2xlarge - $1.72 - Total / hr c3.4xlarge - $2.59 - Total / hr c3.8xlarge - $3.68 - Total / hr c4.large - $0.55 - Total / hr c4.xlarge - $1.099 - Total / hr c4.2xlarge - $1.698 - Total / hr c4.4xlarge - $2.546 - Total / hr c4.8xlarge - $3.841 - Total / hr m4.large - $0.868 - Total / hr m4.xlarge - $1.365 - Total / hr m4.2xlarge- $1.931 - Total / hr | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firewall |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SonicWall NSA Series Score8.3 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Score9.6 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Score9 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 7.9 | 5.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| Sophos UTM | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots |








