TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    SugarSync

    Score3.6 out of 10
    N/ASugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.

    $7.50

    per month

    Tungsten Capture

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ATungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.

    $3,500

    per year

    Pricing
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    Editions & Modules
    100 GB
    $7.49
    per month
    250 GB
    $9.99
    per month
    500 GB
    $18.95
    per month
    Kofax Capture
    $3,500
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of SugarSync and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    SugarSync
    9.4
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    File search9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Security & Administration
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of SugarSync and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    SugarSync
    9.7
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    User and role management10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File organization9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device management10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Platform
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of SugarSync and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    SugarSync
    10.0
    8 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Performance10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reliability10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Reports10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    Small Businesses
    IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2
    Score9.1 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apple iCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ownCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    DocuWare
    Score7.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.2
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SugarSyncTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Ziff Davis Inc
    When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Sync files in any folder - rather than forcing you to store them in a certain place (Although this can be confusing too)
    • Works in the background - although this is true for all
    • You can share with others - including those who do not use SugarSync
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
    • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
    • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
    • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
    • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Ziff Davis Inc
    1. Freemium model is the ideal marketing for an app like this. 2. Now their sync methods with Android are worse
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    It's good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Ziff Davis Inc
    Customer service is amazing, they are always fast to respond and very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Haven't really used their support yet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Ziff Davis Inc
    SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax Capture is much costlier with compared to other competitive applications but is also provides many more features than other applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • There were some opensource alternatives but we wanted something with better support which SugarSync offers.
    • We achieved faster project collaboration with SugarSync.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots