TestComplete vs. WompMobile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
TestComplete
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.
$2,256
per license
WompMobile
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
WompMobile enables any website to be converted to a mobile-friendly format without the need to redesign or change the desktop site. It is a turn-key mobile development solution, meaning no IT involvement is required. This solution uses a proprietary JavaScript-adaptive platform. The vendor says their customers see an increase in mobile traffic and page performance, and an average conversion rate increase of 156%. This solution offers…N/A
Pricing
TestCompleteWompMobile
Editions & Modules
Node-Locked Base
2,256
per license
Node-Locked Pro
3,950
per license
Float - Base
5,077
per license
Float - Pro
7,901
per license
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
TestCompleteWompMobile
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.Mobile website development consists of a one-time development fee and an ongoing monthly service fee. Prices vary depending on the size and scope of the project, website, technology, traffic and other factors.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
TestCompleteWompMobile
Best Alternatives
TestCompleteWompMobile
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.5 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
TestCompleteWompMobile
Likelihood to Recommend
6.9
(88 ratings)
8.9
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(6 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.6
(7 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
TestCompleteWompMobile
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
Best suited to smaller unit test or tests broken up, couple of forms at a time Not suited - larger regressions test involving multiple systems. - my main regression involving payments has been unsuccessful for the last 3 years despite all working fine separately and while being watched
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
At first look we were not sure if WompMobile was well suited for E-Commerce because they had very few examples of E-Commerce sites within their portfolio. We spoke with the team at WompMobile and those concerns were tossed right out the window. I can't think of any scenario where WompMobile would not be able to provide the right mobile solution.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
  • Identifying UI objects and application structure
  • Expandability of tests through scripts and script extensions/plugins
  • low barrier of entry (you can get started quickly, and other's don't need much explanation to contribute on a basic level)
  • Possibility of Jira integration for reporting
  • Relatively few (and usually easy to solve) git conflicts when working simultaneously
  • easy handling of test data, also for iterative tests
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
  • Delivery. On time delivery of design and updates.
  • Access. Whenever we have a question or need something communication is immediate.
  • Best practices. Our speed and SEO scores are outstanding. When Google changes algorithms our mobile site is already prepped for it.
  • Maintenance. If assets pulled from our main site create problems on mobile we are informed right away.
  • Improvements. WompMobile regularly investigates and offers improvements to functionality as the mobile space develops.
Read full review
Cons
SmartBear
  • TestComplete could stand to have a simplified view for different types of users. For instance, as a manager/architecture guy, I'm not so interested in getting into the code and am more interested in file-based interactions.
  • TestComplete could use more integration with reporting for things like TeamCity to improve test status visibility.
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
  • Support Options. We struggled a bit with not having a 24x7 support option from WompMobile. Even though we haven't had to use it, and a global company like us would feel better with a 24x7 support option. We even expected to pay more to have that comfort for "just in case" scenarios. However, their speed in responding to your production issue has been phenomenal, and it makes you wonder if the current model is way better than a 24x7 support option where they might have to hire less costly labor who would take longer to resolve your issue.
  • Test Environment. We struggled not having our test environment connected to their test environment. They have a test environment where they show you the changes, but it's not accessible through your test environment. It's a different concept.
  • Reporting. WompMobile doesn't have a portal or dashboard for customers to see the hits and performance metrics of their site.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
SmartBear
We have bigger test automation pack using test complete at the same time we also think this is not good performing tool for large number of test automation scripts.
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
Great solution and development team
Read full review
Usability
SmartBear
It is usable when you become accustomed to its quirks. Not using it for two months and then you need to re-learn the quirks for some features (but some quirks are so awful that they will never fade from your memory). So, when using it regularly, it is possible to be quite productive, if no big correction in name mapping is needed.
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
SmartBear
Some bugs were quickly resolved, but most UX quirks of the tool are just marked "as designed". No follow up for enhancement request.
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
Great development support
Read full review
Implementation Rating
SmartBear
If you develop a mobile application and your testing process goes in cloud, probably you will face a problem - how to implement a stable connection between your mobile devices and testing servers
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process.
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
I have no basis of comparison. I stumbled upon WompMobile from a mention by This American Life (I think), and worked it out with them. Looked no further
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
  • Saves hundreds of man-hours with either QA testing or data entry
  • With the small cost of the product, it has saved the company money with both employee costs as well as the cost of mistakes made by human error or software bugs
Read full review
WompMobile, Inc.
  • Our mobile site was pretty basic, but once WompMobile changed the site, we saw increased results across our site. Our site runs smoother than before, leading to more positive customer experiences.
  • The site runs faster as well, allowing our customers to shop longer and quicker.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WompMobile Screenshots

Screenshot of Boys & Girls Club of America's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimizeScreenshot of National Geographic's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimizeScreenshot of Jones Soda's website on mobile devices before and after implementing MobileOptimize