TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform vs. Splunk On-Call

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AThe ThreatCure ShieldOps Platform assists businesses in increasing the visibility of various digital assets, and cloud workloads and aggregating them into a single platform to provide security leadership with a 360-degree view and assist in risk identification. Further assisting the incident response team in defending the fundamental infrastructure and addressing zero-day attacks.N/A

    Splunk On-Call

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AFormerly known as VictorOps, Splunk On-Call is an incident response system for developers, devops and operations teams that helps reduce outage time.N/A
    Pricing
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Considered Both Products
    ThreatCure
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    Features
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform and Splunk On-Call
    Feature
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Splunk On-Call
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform and Splunk On-Call
    Feature
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Splunk On-Call
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Hunting Tools
    Comparison of Threat Hunting Tools features of ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform and Splunk On-Call
    Feature
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps Platform
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Splunk On-Call
    -
    Ratings
    Scanning for Vulnerabilities8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Behavioral Analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.0
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ThreatCure® ShieldOps PlatformSplunk On-Call
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ThreatCure
    ThreatCure Guardian Care services enable us to block C&C connections from some of our infrastructure systems. They told us that they had seen lateral movements in the early stages, which may indicate a ransom attack. They later provided us with a comprehensive report detailing the threat actors who were utilizing an insider threat in this.
    Read full review
    Cisco
    I recommend Splunk on-call is more suited where there are high incident queues; multiple teams need to be involved in handling a P1 severity issue. Multiple levels of escalation are needed environment where automated action is required. I recommend the solution for large-scale & medium-scale business units. For small-scale business units, I see the functional value is less.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ThreatCure
    • Indepth knowledge of our infrastructure
    • Complete Threat Landscape view
    • Early detection of threats
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Easily assign work/tickets between multiple users
    • Supports a wide variety of software integrations
    • Easy to manage scheduling tool
    • As part of the Splunk toolset, provides detailed levels of data analysis at our engineers fingertips
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ThreatCure
    • Would suggest ThreatCure red-teaming services.
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • The user interface can be furthe improved
    • Licensing needs to be simplified and packaged as a bundle with other Splunk product like Enterprise Security
    • Customer outreach can be further enhanced
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ThreatCure
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ThreatCure
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    Not a lot of love given to VO since the acquisition by Splunk from my POV
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ThreatCure
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    VictorOps support has proven excellent for us. Because it is such a widely used tool, there is a lot of documentation on usage, and a large community of users to lean on. Also, many engineers have had experience working with VictorOps already, and the tool is so easy to setup / manage that much support isn't really necessary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    ThreatCure
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ThreatCure
    While some items offer perfect sight, others fall short in other respects. The ThreatCure ShieldOps platform provides our management and incident response team with a 360-degree perspective. This facilitates quicker decision-making for the future. Furthermore, ThreatCure has an opex model, but other suppliers require significant Capex investments, which is an added advantage of SMB organization like us.
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk On-Call integrates better with our Splunk Cybersecurity and Reporting products due to the same family tree of the same eco system. We were previously using built-in on-call from individual applications and while adequate, they were difficult to manage and support SLA varied greatly across different applications. In addition we also used xMatters which did not integrate well with SAP products nor Citrix products so we were still using more than a single on-call product which was solved by implementing Splunk On-Call
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ThreatCure
    • Now with lesser opex we are getting complete visibility.
    • Now would like to acquire Threat Cure Guardian Care Services
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • It runs our on call rotation so it makes it easy for us.
    • It integrates with Slack so it makes it easy for us to manage through Slack.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots