IBM Turbonomic vs. VMware ESXi

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by cloud, infrastructure operations, and architecture to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. One of the key features of IBM Turbonomic is its ability to continuously adjust application resources in real time. By monitoring resource utilization and application performance,…N/A
VMware ESXi
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
A bare-metal hypervisor that installs directly onto a physical server. With direct access to and control of underlying resources, VMware ESXi partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.N/A
Pricing
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Editions & Modules
IBM® Turbonomic On-Prem
Varies - Request a Quote
per month IBM Turbonomic On-prem optimizes data center resources in real time, ensuring app performance at the lowest cost by aligning infrastructure supply with dynamic application demand.
IBM® Turbonomic Cloud Standard
Varies - Request a Quote
per month For customers with more than USD 1.6 million in annual cloud spend or 50 Managed Virtual Servers (MVS) or greater
IBM® Turbonomic Hybrid Standard
Varies - Request a Quote
per month Advanced hybrid cloud optimization capabilities for customers with 200 managed virtual servers (MVS) or more
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsVolume discounting available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Considered Both Products
IBM Turbonomic
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We found that that the support we had from IBM and 3rd party vender on IBM Turbonomic was superb , and was one of deciding factors of why we choose IBM Turbonomic. We like a lot of the automation features , and how it helps our engineers work smarter. Even though the VM ware A…
Chose IBM Turbonomic
Turbonomic blew the doors off the competition. When we did a comparison to our current application that was monitoring our environment, Turbonomic surpassed them with flying colors at the start during the POC. Then during the POC white we were kicking the tires around the …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
The only comparable alternative has been DRS and sDRS which are native to vCenter. These tools have had to suffice for managing resources and placement. Thusfar, they have been working for us well. Although there is some manual work and reliance on monitoring tools to ensure …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
Turbonomic is a very good product. It is much more than a tool for monitoring and optimization for the VMware environment. Specifically, it can also have insights into the Cisco UCS world and can optimize that too! So it is not operating only on the VM level.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
With Turbonomic you can have an aggregator instance. In this instance you add as a Turbonomic target another Turbonomic server that you have in your environment. With an aggregator instance you can manage several Turbonomic servers from a central location.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
vRealize is a decent product however it only makes placement decisions, it doesn't automate intelligent workload placement. It also, in my opinion, is way too aggressive in its VM resource right-sizing recommendations.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
While vCenter Server from VMware is a great product, it is designed to be more of an informational and warning system, rather than a proactive take action automatically when needed system. That is the core difference. Also, pricing wise it is more expensive than Turbonomic.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We used to use Solarwinds Virtualisation manager but found its recommendations limited and its insight into the environment unhelpful. Also the planning tool we used for capacity management was clunky and complicated to use and confidently report on.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We started with VMWare Operations Manager. At the time we were using it, it didn't offer automation. Also, the dashboard wasn't as easy to use as VMTurbo either. This is why we went with VMTurbo.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
To be honest, I've worked with a lot of different management tools, and I just don't see how you can compare VMTurbo to any of them. No one I know of does what they do.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We were using vROPs (vRealize Operations Manager) but felt it was too cumbersome to maintain without a dedicated resource. VMTurbo is much easier to use and maintain. Even though there is overlap in the 2 tools, we have kept vROPs as a "tactical troubleshooting tool" at the ESX …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
Have not used another product.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
Oher products were costly and much harder to use and implement. This has a great GUI and reporting tools and it was an amazing addition to our environment. It is especially helpful to show why certain requests didn't need as much space and utilization.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
The product was already at the company when I started.
VMware ESXi
Chose VMware ESXi
Barring the licensing costs, ESXi brings substantial benefit over Hyper-V. However, Hyper-V does offer much more simplistic management. ESXi is more capable in VM recovery events over Hyper-V. Nutanix AHV, particularly for medium and large businesses, offer a more dynamic, …
Chose VMware ESXi
From a management perspective, I find VMware ESXi easier to organize the environment, maneuver through each section, provide role-based access control, and modify each virtual machine. For me, the key feature is the ability to right-click on each individual VM and make the …
Features
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Turbonomic
8.1
19 Ratings
7% below category average
VMware ESXi
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security7.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration8.418 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management8.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring8.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.218 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Turbonomic
-
Ratings
VMware ESXi
8.2
128 Ratings
2% above category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning00 Ratings8.0116 Ratings
Management console00 Ratings9.0128 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup00 Ratings8.0112 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration00 Ratings8.1116 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security00 Ratings8.0117 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 8.5 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 8.5 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 9.2 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(147 ratings)
9.0
(129 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(24 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(21 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(6 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(25 ratings)
10.0
(55 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.7
(18 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
9.1
(2 ratings)
5.1
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(5 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.3
(4 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM TurbonomicVMware ESXi
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Measure the usage of resources across different platforms, from Kubernetes to VMs on-premises or in the cloud, to obtain current capacity metrics and plan for future scenarios. Reduce IT infrastructure costs by taking automated actions based on resource underutilization, such as shutting down VMs or changing resource definitions.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
If you're looking for the industry standard in server virtualization, I would recommend ESXi. After decades of expertise in the field, VMware continues to provide a strong product, production-ready, with an easy-to-learn interface that allows for quick management along with less costly upfront onboarding and training. Grab the free personal-use license and install in your homelab to start!
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Presentation is nice. Its easy to understand what your looking at and the data that is being presented to you.
  • Properly identify resource utilization and recommendations for action on how VMs can be improved and resources can be better utilized.
  • It was also able to tell us the same information and analysis for cloud resources. I was not expecting that.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Resource management. The automatic load balancing works very well to ensure no host is taxed disproportionately compared to the others.
  • Templates and cloning. It is very easy to set up a template and spin up new servers based on a specific setup. This makes server management very streamlined.
  • VM management. The vSphere interface is very easy to use and navigate. Everything is responsive and it works when you need it to. The options are also robust while also being arranged in a straightforward manner.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • It would be nice if the UI included a break-down of features that are both licensed as well as un-licensed. That way, you could not only see what you have, but what you don't.
  • The right-sizing recommendations are great, but very little info is given about why the recommendation is being made. More info would not only increase understanding, but would also help drive decision-making.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • VMware ESXi can improve on the UI that is installed on the bare metal machine. The menus can be hard to navigate when looking for simple configuration items.
  • VMware ESXi can improve on the stability of their overall hypervisor. There have been a few times we had to reinstall due to corruption of VMware ESXi.
  • I would like to see VMware ESXi do better at adding more standard free features in their consumer version of VMware ESXi. For example, having the ability to back up virtual machines is good practice and something that would be very nice if offered in their free version.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
We are certainly happy with Turbonomic as a whole and have invested quite a bit of time and effort into learning the ins and outs of the product. We have our reporting setup the way we want it and have gained definite value from these features. I will say though that many products nowadays are offering more native monitoring, reporting, and alerting features which may eventually steer us away from this product
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
It is critical to our business, what started out as a way to do certain functions, it has now become core to ensuring our product is available to our customers and reducing our costs to operate and reduce our recovery time and provisioning servers. Their support is great and the costs to renew is reasonable.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
Excellent approach to larger VM organizational management. They have an very clean integrated dashboard that allows us to see everything in our environment and what that is doing in real-time. It works on multiple hyper-visors really well and integrates capacity planning on my local site as well as my cloud locations.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
The interface is fairly intuitive for most things, and the areas that are a little less obvious usually have fantastic documentation in the online knowledgebase. In 3-4 years of managing our ESXi hosts, I think that I have only opened 4-5 support cases for things that I could not figure out myself or find answers to on the website.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
VMTurbo has not caused any outages by not doing what we expect it to do.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
Without the need to patch the servers with bug fixes and enhancements we whave not experienced any downtime with VMware issues. Even the bug fixes and updates do not cause of downtime as we just migrate the servers to the opposite node and update the one and then move servers back. Very simple and painless.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
It allocates resources among applications by showing more on the cost breakdown by cloud service, with metrics on cloud provider information like Azure Management, Identity, Networking, Storage with costs per day, and total services costs. This then could facilitate and show the corresponding actions thereafter upon scaling.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We do not notice any difference between a physical and virtual server running the same workload. In fact we can scale quicker with the virtual server than we can with the physical.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
When I contact support I get a quick response and they are able to solve my problem quickly. I also get a sense that they want to make sure that we are getting value from the product and walk me through whatever steps are needed to accomplish my goals.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
I can't say enough good about VMware's support team. To an individual they take ownership of the case, provide thorough answers, and follow up regularly. On one occasion, a problem we experienced with NSX Endpoint was escalated to development for a permanent resolution after a workaround was found. In my experience, most companies would have tried to find a way to close a case like that instead of taking it all the way. Most importantly, when production is down and every second counts, they VMware teams understand that urgency and treat your issue as if it were the only one they had to deal with. You can't ask for better.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
Alex (from VMTurbo) has worked with the product for years and helped develop the product. He was very knowledgeable and was able to provide our support team with details knowledge on how to get our deployment configured correctly as well as help with another VMTurbo POC within another customers environment.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
After buying VMTurbo Operations Manager, I was invited to an online user training event. I felt this training was effective and dug just deep enough to be informative yet still keep my attention. Additionally, the webinar was free.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
The implementation was very simple. Just upload an OVA file and power on the VM. Once it comes up enter some networking information and you can then access the web interface. From there, just begin configuring the system for your environment by adding you license and the various virtual environments and storage through the inventory tab
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
Jsut read and follow anything your storage provider may require to allow the integration of VMware with storage operations, outside of that VMware jsut works.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
As the organization had experience of years in using IBM products, we had the confidence that they will provide us with great support. And we needed a reliable solution as a financial institute to ensure continuous operations. Even though the price was very high, we made the correct decision to go ahead with IBM Turbonomic as the feedback from existing users in the region was very positive. We needed a solution which was capable of handling our automation requirements. All these were green in IBM Turbonomic.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
As long as you're using Nutanix AOS on Nutanix hardware and are paying their software support fees, AOS is a valid competitor to VMware and can save money due to not needing a license and having their server management system built into the base host management system. If you aren't using Nutanix hardware, however, VMWare is in most cases the best way to go. I cannot comment on HyperV, but most IT people I know either use it because they have to (most) or they like it better (not many).
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
it has been fair and easy to understand. I know VMware is looking at wanting to change from CPU to core pricing so we will see what that looks like when it happens.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
It’s very scalable.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We started out with a two-server cluster and adding a third or fourth is very straightforward and simple with no issues. You just need to be aware of the size of your Vcenter Server to handle the workload, but still the resources needed is very minimal
Read full review
Professional Services
IBM
Professional services were always there to guide us in our transformation to the cloud. They understood our business model and then were able to provide guidance on what we needed from the tool.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Application performance has been a big one. With Turbonomic keeping everything running at top performance, it can make changes when extra resources are need, quicker than somebody being notified and then making the necessary changes.
  • Turbonomic has been a great cost savings for us on multiple occasions. We use it every time we are improving servers.
  • With the planning feature we get the best performance form new hardware purchases
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • VMWare ESXi licensing is affordable for our business - and the licensing model is simplistic. Not like that of Microsoft with having to keep track of server licenses and CAL licenses for users.
  • VMWare ESXi also has hardware-monitoring built-in, so that further saves us money from having to be spent with another vendor.
  • As much as I hate the saying "a single pane of glass" does fit for this product. You can manage your servers, monitor hardware status, create and export backup snapshots, manage virtual NICs, connect to various storage devices. We're very happy with this product.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Turbonomic Screenshots

Screenshot of IBM Turbonomic Action Center, where it shows the list of optimization actions across the global environment—on-prem and cloud—that should be taken to minimize cost while assuring performance.Screenshot of IBM Turbonomic Application, a view that shows the global environment across private and public infrastructure from the context of individual application components. Users can optimize one application at a time by viewing each app's pending actions. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities across applications and their interdependencies.Screenshot of The IBM Turbonomic Cloud Executive Dashboard, an out of the box dashboard that allow users to rapidly communicate value to executives. This view shows the cloud cost savings opportunities realized and not yet realized over any time period.Screenshot of The IBM Turbonomic On-prem Executive Dashboard, an out of the box dashboard that allow users to rapidly communicate value to executives. This view shows the savings opportunities realized and not yet realized over any time period.Screenshot of an IBM Turbonomic Cloud view, where the public cloud environment(s) and all of the pending actions required to bring them into an efficient, performant state. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities in the public cloud(s) and their interdependencies.Screenshot of The IBM Turbonomic On-Prem view that shows the user's private data center environment(s) and all of the pending actions required to bring them into an efficient, performant state. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities in data center(s) and the interdependencies between them.