Ventiv Claims is a solid system. Ventiv offered the modules and system specs we were looking for. I have been working with VOS, and IVOS for many years, so I was very familiar with the platform.
We have been using the iVos claims system for about 20 years before that we used PACASSO which was bought by another company. We did an RFP for the claims system in 2001 and chose the Valley Oak system, which has morphed into the current system we use with Ventiv.
Our Safety group uses IRM for dashboards and OSHA 300 reporting. While I am do not work directly for the Safety group, I believe IRM has all of the capabilities needed to be a very successful product.
We already had Ventiv CE when we looked into these. We administer for a client that utilizes SIMS, which allows for less customization and slower load times, as well as less freedom of movement within the application. We also looked in to Origami Risk as an alternative and …
I have not met with any other RMIS vendors in a very long time. They reach out all the time; however there's no sense in wasting anyone's time. I am happy with Ventiv, there are times I may get upset because there is no response when I ask for something. But I chalk it up to …
RL Solutions/RLDatix was another company that we evaluated but they did not have anything Workers' Comp related at the time. Origami Risk was another company that we evaluated but they didn't have anything Workers' Comp related at the time and were very pricy. RiskMaster was …
Ventiv Claims is much more robust. Ventiv [Claims] is the best option in my opinion because it covers workers' compensation compliance in one system. [In] most other systems we have evaluated, you would have to also enlist a third party to comply with state and federal standards.
Riskonnect is currently used, along with Ventiv Claims. Riskonnect was thought to be a more user-friendly database and better suited for conversion to other systems/products/departments. Ventiv Claims has a better overall claims administration system.