VideoMost vs. Whereby

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
VideoMost
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Video conferencing software that enables users to communicate via two-way audio and video calls, send files, and share screen. VideoMost Server is comparable to Zoom but self-hosted video conferencing server. Using both Scalable video coding (SVC and MUX) and traditional MCU (MIX) architecture VideoMost automatically and dynamically adjusts video quality to available network conditions and CPU utilization throughout a conference session, and provides total legacy HW…N/A
Whereby
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Norwegian company appear.in offers their flagship video conferencing platform to small teams, both in a free edition hosting up to 4 guests simultaneously in a session or a paid edition that supports up to 12 simultaneous meeting guests, among other features.
$0
per user
Pricing
VideoMostWhereby
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per user
Pro
$9.99
per user
Business
$59.99 and up
per user/room
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
VideoMostWhereby
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
VideoMostWhereby
Considered Both Products
VideoMost
Chose VideoMost
As I know our company has chosen VideoMost because it has a good trial period. During this period our department manager was able to check whether or not it was an appropriate format for us. And it turned out to be a good quality product that we have been using almost for 2 …
Chose VideoMost
Skype is complicated to use for work. Microsoft Teams is more expensive and has a lot of tools that are not necessary for us.
Chose VideoMost
We had been selecting the best option for us using such characteristics as price, easy use, necessary tools (whiteboard, screen sharing and etc.) If I need to compare VideoMost with its rivals I can say 1. it is cheaper than Zoom 2. more easy and more convenient to use than …
Whereby
Chose Whereby
I find Zoom more complicated to use and harder to use because a lot of people do not like having to download things to their computers or devices and Whereby is so easy to get connected with . I like that Zoom offers larger rooms, but at this point the cost is not worth the …
Chose Whereby
For me it was Zoom, Google Meet vs. Whereby. For me, the main idea was to make it easier for the clients (non-technical people) to join and starting to have a talk. For Zoom, it was too much, even for myself, and Google Meet always needs a calendar integration, but with Whereby …
Chose Whereby
I did not evaluate other applications against Whereby, because we had a very specific need, which was the partner that we would use the solution, only accepted to use Whereby, so, we accepted to use the solution. As it was for a specific period, there was no problem. And in the …
Chose Whereby
Nicer layout than any other competitor by far, reactions for emojis pop up on your video (have not seen this anywhere else), easier to access (no downloads). Also, useful internally to always use the same URL, so if you have an ad hoc meeting everyone knows where to go. This …
Chose Whereby
Whereby offers better features and is easier to use than both Zoom and Google Hangouts.
Chose Whereby
We looked at BlueJeans, Zoom, and Google Hangouts. We selected Whereby because you can see multiple people (up to 12) in one screen. We also liked the interface.
Chose Whereby
Zoom I find clunky and not user-friendly as it's always asking you to do updates, attend their seminar trainings, and different codes. It's also expensive. GoToMeeting is much the same as Zoom.
Chose Whereby
When compared to the other VC platforms, we found Whereby the easiest to use for users and invitees. The only install from a recipient's point-of-view is a Chrome extension. Zoom requires a download and an account to sign into. Microsoft Teams is only for other members on the …
Chose Whereby
You're able to create unique links for people to join and use words and phrases in the link for the invite. I think that helps you with branding yourself as a company. On Google Hangouts we're not able to do something like this, which is why I appreciate Whereby and being able …
Chose Whereby
Whereby allows you to see everyone instead of just the last few people to talk. It also has no software to download and install. It works on any device that can access a website.
Chose Whereby
I don't know that it is an apples-to-apples comparison because in most other cases I used these platforms alongside Whereby. The best direct comparison would be Google Hangouts. With Whereby, I think the video and audio are superior, the UX is superior, and it's just a better …
Chose Whereby
Whereby is a great tool for individual meetings or among small groups. It's super simple to use and very convenient. But if you need to have meetings with more than 10 people, a tool like Zoom is probably necessary. You'll have more options to control who can share and who can …
Chose Whereby
It is a very simple tool. It can be accessed by all very fast. Sometimes we do more than one videoconference simultaneously and Whereby helps a lot as a second option, especially with few participants.
Chose Whereby
appear.in was the least expensive alternative at the time my company used it. It included the right set of features for what we needed.
Features
VideoMostWhereby
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
VideoMost
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
Whereby
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
High quality audio9.60 Ratings9.00 Ratings
High quality video9.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements8.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile support9.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
VideoMost
9.7
Ratings
20% above category average
Whereby
8.0
Ratings
1% above category average
Desktop sharing10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Whiteboards9.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
VideoMost
9.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Whereby
9.4
Ratings
14% above category average
Calendar integration9.40 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Meeting initiation10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integrates with social media7.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Record meetings / events9.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Slideshows9.30 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
VideoMost
9.1
Ratings
12% above category average
Whereby
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat9.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Audience polling9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Q&A8.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
VideoMost
9.4
Ratings
16% above category average
Whereby
6.9
Ratings
15% below category average
User authentication10.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions9.30 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
VideoMostWhereby
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.8 out of 10
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
VideoMostWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
VideoMostWhereby
Likelihood to Recommend
We use it in the retail sphere. It is convenient to use screen sharing cause we work with lots of chats. I believe it is suitable for all types of companies due to VM's tools. It's difficult to say that it can be inappropriate for somebody because it is a thing that we use almost every day.
Read full review
Whereby is well suited for making connections with clients and people who are not technologically savvy. It is very easy to use for the most part. It does not work very well when I am trying to screenshare and show demonstrations of excel spreadsheets, but not a lot of products do
Read full review
Pros
  • Wide range of tools
  • Mid-tier price
  • Good video quality
Read full review
  • Easy to use: The app is very, very easy to use. Literally just create a chat room (input a name) and access it to chat.
  • Call/video quality: I've experienced better call quality on appear.in than in almost all other chat and video conferencing services out there.
Read full review
Cons
  • Do updated not so often
Read full review
  • The paid version may have dial-in. But I have always used the free version. Dial-in is typically required for an "official" multi-purpose teleconference platform.
  • I did have some trouble with larger groups (5+) when it was Appear.in but almost always use it for small 1-on-1 or 3 person meetings.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are using a larger tool suite that already includes video conferencing instead of our older approach of using different apps from different vendors. appear.in has a simple but great set of features but its pricing scheme is not as scalable as we really need in a 500+ employee company.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Very easy to use, technical and non-technical colleagues have used it with no instructions needed. That says all about the app and services.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Never had to contact support, so we cannot give a rating for their overall support. When we noticed the audio was not always great quality, we simply educated our users to mute the mic and use the in-room conference phone which is connected via a dedicated VOIP link and had much better voice quality. The video performance varied by locations network speed and found it got much worse when the room size increased to over 4 connections.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
After a recommendation from a partner, as the system is very easy to use, we simply start.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Skype is complicated to use for work. Microsoft Teams is more expensive and has a lot of tools that are not necessary for us.
Read full review
I did not evaluate other applications against Whereby, because we had a very specific need, which was the partner that we would use the solution, only accepted to use Whereby, so, we accepted to use the solution. As it was for a specific period, there was no problem. And in the end, it proved to be a very stable, very fast solution, with no need for crazy plugins or anything. Basically, it was access[ed] and use.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • All employees keep in touch easily.
Read full review
  • In general, any sort of online collaborations saves a lot on your budget. The meetings are rather more on time and can be efficient and short.
  • Easy to drop-by and have a small talk with clients/teammates within COVID era.
  • The URL makes you look fancy instead of a random hash.
Read full review
ScreenShots

VideoMost Screenshots

Screenshot of Using VideoMost on computersScreenshot of Using VideoMost on cell phone

Whereby Screenshots

Screenshot of Easy video meetings in your browser. No downloads, no login.Screenshot of Up to 50 participants in Townhall rooms.Screenshot of Record, save, and share meetings.