NetApp FAS series

NetApp FAS series

About TrustRadius Scoring
Score 8.2 out of 100
NetApp FAS series

Overview

Recent Reviews

NetApp FAS -High Performance Storage Solution

9
February 05, 2022
It has a robust operating system and the support is also very good. Replication and block-level snapshot backup is a very good option to …
Read full review

Did not live up to expectations

5
April 27, 2021
I've used several NetApp FAS series devices in different organizations to handle large storage requirements for various systems or entire …

NetApp is losing market FAS

7
March 15, 2021
Our NetApp's served file shares, VMware, and Microsoft LUN data. This was used across our organization. We went through 2 hardware …
Read full review

Strong and Reliable storage

10
August 28, 2020
NetApp has been defined as a Global standard for NAS (CIFS, NFS) workloads in our company, so it is being actively used in several of our …
Read full review

NetApp (F)ast (A)nd (S)table

10
March 04, 2020
NetApp FAS is being used in our environment as our SAN and CIFS file system. This system replaced an old (and undersized) storage array. …
Read full review

NetApp FAS Does it All Review

8
April 11, 2018
It is being used for the IT department or across the whole organization. It solves our IT Infrastructure growth issue. We are a small …
Read full review

NetApp FAS... a universal storage problem solver!

8
April 26, 2016
We are a large NetApp customer that uses the full NetApp product portfolio. We have approximately 20PB of NetApp FAS in use today ranging …
Read full review

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of NetApp FAS series, and make your voice heard!

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is NetApp FAS series?

NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting / Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

Alternatives Pricing

What is Clear Analytics?

Clear Analytics is a business intelligence solution that enables non technical end users to perform analytics by leveraging existing knowledge of Excel coupled with a built in query builder. Some key features include: Dynamic Data Refresh, Data Share and In-Excel Collaboration.

Features Scorecard

No scorecards have been submitted for this product yet..

Product Details

What is NetApp FAS series?

NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.

NetApp FAS series Video

Trusted Data Protection with NetApp All Flash FAS (AFF)

NetApp FAS series Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Comparisons

View all alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

What is NetApp FAS series?

NetApp's FAS series systems offers a storage array system for enterprises.

What is NetApp FAS series's best feature?

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 9.8.

Who uses NetApp FAS series?

The most common users of NetApp FAS series are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees) and the Information Technology & Services industry.

Reviews and Ratings

 (48)

Ratings

Reviews

(1-15 of 15)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Adam Paradis | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
The FAS8300 is snappy and very powerful. This NetApp FAS8300 implementation supports NFS-connected storage for over 25 VMware hosts which house over 900 VMs along with direct-Linux connections for hundreds of guest operating systems. Connected disk tiers range from an SSD flash pool to achieve faster access and to 900 GB to 8 TB in size.
  • Administration through web GUI and CLI.
  • Reliability.
  • Performance.
  • Web GUI. It is fairly fast and concise, however, it is missing many fundamental settings that can only be done via CLI.
  • Updates; while these have progressively become easier this functionality is still lacking on the GUI side.
  • Performance reporting is decent but doesn't provide detailed data. High-level graphs help, but are not very concise when troubleshooting.
It is very easy to use with NFS. Creating new volumes and mounting to servers such as ESXi or Linux is a breeze. It does also support CIFS but it is far less intuitive and requires much more effort. Replicated data is also very simple and robust in the form of SnapVaults or SnapMirrors. This data is either immediately or periodically replicated to a peer FAS in the cluster for retention.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
It has a robust operating system and the support is also very good. Replication and block-level snapshot backup is a very good option to mirror the data in other environments and for disaster recovery. The backup and restore process is much easier with the FAS series. We are mainly using it for storing our DB and to replicate the data to different environments.
  • Backup and restore
  • I/O Performance
  • Support
  • I would like to see the GUI to be improved bit more
  • Cost is something I would like to get reduced even though it's not possible :-)
  • Integration with active directory
We are using Netapp for years and I've been very happy with NetApp's performance and the hardware has been extremely reliable. One of the things I like most is the support and it's very responsive and knowledgeable when we need them. The only downside is the price and it's something pulling us back when we thought of implementing it in more business areas.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
NetApp [FAS] is being used for my BFS client; the FAS series is used as NAS devices [that] provide files as a services to many users as well as for FC and iSCSI protocol. [The] FAS 8000 and 9000 Series have been used in [the] current environment.
  • File as a service
  • Faster Backup
  • Data ONTAP
  • Connectivity via FC/SMB/NFS/iSCSI
  • [It provides] automation in workflow management.
  • [The] L1 technical support is not good at all.
  • [In my opinion, the] upgrades should be live and non-disruptive.
This NetApp FAS series is suited for all types of environments starting from mid to large scale organizations. This can be used as [a] file as a service model as well as [an] offsite backup tool. SnapMirror feature could be used as [a] DR solution, which in our case is used from one site to another site, and as of today, we have [approximately] 35 PB of storage just in [the] FAS series.
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Netapp FAS series, is being used by the entire organization for relational and non-relational databases, both with iscsi, NFS and FC protocols.
  • Backups
  • Redundancy
  • Performance
  • low latency
  • improve monitoring software
  • easy implementation whit cloud public
It is very good for backups on SAS disks, he is robust with his raid DP, which gives peace of mind that the data will not be corrupted. Unlike other vendors, in NetApp FAS series, the admin can configure everything
Chris Saenz | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
I've used several NetApp FAS series devices in different organizations to handle large storage requirements for various systems or entire data centers. It has been used as top-tier storage with innovative enterprise features like flash cache and deduplication. I've also used many of its backup features that are touted as a big part of the NetApp software.
  • Clustered storage
  • Multiple connectivity options (Fibre Channel, iSCSI, CIFS/SMB, etc.)
  • Options for mapping volumes to different connectivity types
  • Deduplication job runs at certain times and creates a large CPU overhead for the system
  • Management of a volumes, disk groups, LUNs, etc. is a burden to manage and is not efficient with storage capacity
  • Upgrades are complicated and not "non-disruptive"
The NetApp FAS series has the features to be an enterprise-class storage system, however, at this point they do not perform as well as other storage systems. Management of the system is very involved and requires a lot of oversight. Having to divide up the disks into groups and volumes and LUNs or shares is a nightmare to manage in a large environment. Deduplication is another feature that is great in theory, but the CPU overhead to run the deduplication job is ridiculous. Having to decide between saving space and just having enough CPU to serve IO requests is not a user-friendly choice to have to make.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Our NetApp's served file shares, VMware, and Microsoft LUN data. This was used across our organization. We went through 2 hardware refreshes. Originally we needed to start with entry-level SAN and move away from file server-based storage, but it expanded over time.
  • Hardware is flawless.
  • Support is top shelf.
  • Many in one solution.
  • Cost, like most things with NetApp.
  • Upgrades challenging for the gun-shy.
  • Deduplication problematic when it fails.
NetApp FAS is great if you need to combine CIFS and iSCSI/LUN into one box. The local node clustering worked rather well and the transition from one node to another was within reasonable time limits.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
NetApp FAS controllers are being used to store critical system data for operational sites. They provide the primary storage platform for VMware-based storage at a number of locations. Applications running on NetApp FAS controllers range from infrastructure-based services (VMware, Monitoring, Anti-Virus) and application servers. Deployments range from standalone FAS to MetroCluster deployments.
  • Unstructured data
  • Lifecycling of hardware (C-DOT)
  • Metro level high-availability (MetroCluster)
  • MyASUP integration
  • 7-mode's licensing model was more favorable.
  • Some CLI commands are too cumbersome without automation, driving users to the GUI.
  • Physical cabling can be daunting for new users or DC facilities.
NetApp FAS is well suited to environments running VMware with an IP-based fabric. Whilst I have used FC storage fabrics, other storage arrays manage FC better than NetApp. So if you have a requirement for a large number of RDM's in VMware or WSFC disks, another product might suit you better. NetApp FAS also excels in environments with Linux-based deployments that require the consumption of NFS-based volumes.
Jorge Filho | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
[NetApp FAS series] is being used throughout the virtual environment, delivered on LUNs and also for direct delivery of NFS to virtual machines.
  • NFS delivery for easy management, delivery and expansion.
  • Thin Provision delivery, leaving no waste of data.
  • Easy access when maintenance is required.
  • Monitoring part, in relation to generating historical and governmental data.
  • Discs that need to be changed very often.
  • Better Thin Provision warnings when exceeding the actual storage capacity.
Membership Scenario:
Critical environment with the need for high availability and large environments, NetApp FAS [series] adherence is easily recommended.

Unsuitable scenario.
Companies with small datacenters, since there is no low cost scenario for joining Storage.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
NetApp has been defined as a Global standard for NAS (CIFS, NFS) workloads in our company, so it is being actively used in several of our sites across the globe. The largest sites using it are the USA, Brazil and Norway.
One of the main reasons for it to be selected as the standard for NAS workloads is the resiliency and high availability it provides. In Brazil, we have ~5000 users accessing more than 700TB of user data (CIFS shares) on a daily basis. We didn't have a single availability incident in the last 7 years!
  • NAS Workloads (CIFS, NFS)
  • Snapshot retention/management
  • Disaster Recovery protection (SnapMirror and SnapVault)
  • Storage efficiency (compress, deduplication)
  • The workload balance between the nodes is managed manually
In my opinion, NAS workloads and data protection are two of the strongest points that Netapp has. It sounds a kind of obvious as they created the NAS concept. A NetApp FAS cluster suits very well for scenarios/companies where the unstructured data (users CIFS shares) are one of the most important workloads. This is our scenario in many of our sites and this is why it was selected to be our standard solution. It also handles SAN workloads very well, but maybe you`d rather go with an HCI solution for block workloads.
NetApp support in Brazil is managed by its partners. We know in other countries, such as the US and NO, they have support directly from Netapp. We have a very good NetApp partner working with us since the beginning, on both the implementation and daily support. Very few cases needed to be escalated to NetApp support, most of the cases are handled and satisfyingly closed by the partner.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
NetApp FAS is being used in our environment as our SAN and CIFS file system. This system replaced an old (and undersized) storage array. This system is now used for a number of things including a complete disaster recovery plan and backup system. One important part of this was to speed up backup recovery times. NetApp software makes this possible.
  • Backups are a piece of cake with Snapshot technology.
  • Disaster recovery plans are made much easier with SnapMirroring to remote locations.
  • The support is incredible. Auto Support makes it incredibly easy. The Auto Support website also gives you a great view of your NetApp deployment.
  • Redundant paths make updating and maintenance much easier with no downtime.
  • System Manager is missing some commands and therefore you have to rely on CLI. This is not a problem for most admins but it has room for improvement.
  • Cabling diagrams for redundant path can be confusing.
  • When we had one of the older models in place our drives would spontaneously pop out of place due to old plastic clips. We have not had the same issue again with a newer NetApp model.
NetApp FAS systems are extremely scalable and therefore, in my opinion, they can have a place in any environment. The built-in software has some great use cases including recovery and mitigation of ransomware attacks. The speed of backups and restoration is incredible. The ability to restore a single file out of millions is also incredibly handy.
I've said it before. I'll say it again. NetApp has fantastic support. The Hardware Universe and the Auto Support websites give you incredible information. This info is not just generic model info but it is driven by the data sent by your actual filer. When you get on a support call they can see everything currently in place in your environment.
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We use a NetApp FAS3210 in our main office and a FAS2240 offsite in our colo. The FAS3210 is our primary storage for all of our VMWare environment, which includes 9 VMWare hosts and over 220 virtual servers. The FAS2240 in the colo is used for a handful of production VMWare machines, as well as the storage of some offsite backup from our executive office.
  • It was fairly easy to implement with guided assistance from NetApp.
  • We haven't had many drive failures.
  • The pricing was right.
  • We have had too many troubles with the controllers, had one die completely, and are now fighting an issue where the two don't communicate.
  • They try to nickel and dime you with extra costs for additional features.
  • Software upgrades are too difficult.
NetApp, as far as the storage itself goes, is quite fine. It was very competitively priced when we looked at it, so it's probably good for medium to large businesses. Smaller businesses could probably get by with a much cheaper solution, possibly even just a NAS device. It would also be good for any offsite backup as well.
Among the worst support we've ever had. The reason I say this is we had one of our 2 controller boards die completely. They sent a technician out, which was obviously a 3rd-party contracted person, and he didn't know much about NetApp, but was able to swap the board out. He contacted support and handed the phone over to me, and the technician walked me through reassigning disks to the new controller, but he had me assigning the wrong disks, which caused our whole SAN to go down, and we lost connectivity to all our 220+ servers for many hours. It was a complete nightmare. Then this past October out of the blue we get an alert that the controllers have lost high availability. Basically, they aren't communicating with each other. Also, keep in mind these controllers aren't connected to each other via a cable, they are both contained in the same chassis, so it must be a bug. I've been working with support still since then, almost going on 1 year! They constantly miss our calls, ignore my emails/calls, etc. It's very frustrating to deal with.
Albert Buendía | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
Two NetApp FAS series are being used as CIFS servers. They serve all the department's folders for the whole organization. So, we replaced our typical Windows servers with a NetApp solution. Why? Basically, for two main reasons. First, for security purposes. We make volumes snapshots every hour. In the case of a ransomware infection, we resolve the incident by managing snapshots. The second reason we switched was so fileservers don't have a typical NetBIOS name. We use NetApp for our CIFS servers in conjunction with Active Directory DFS so folders and files have no dependencies of a fileserver name. This is great.
  • Volume snapshots
  • CIFS server
  • Snapmirror between both NetApp storage instances
  • Hardware snapshots with backup software
  • Software Management
  • Bundle software is hard to implement and use
  • Tecnical support is lacking, at least here in Spain
Best suited as a good alternative to typical Windows virtual file servers. It is less appropriate as a virtual machine repository.
Vin Campbell | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We have one NetApp FAS2200 device that houses the entire backend of our virtual server network behind two Dell PowerEdge R front end servers. This device houses all of the virtual server files for all of the organization's virtual server infrastructure. This one device -- containing an array of hard drives -- pumps out enough speed and bandwidth to run about 12+ servers at the same time.
  • Support. Support. Support. It's been a welcomed surprise to have a hard drive land on my desk, and a better surprise to have a NetApp tech arrive soon after to install the drive. I didn't even know the drive failed-- now that's support.
  • AS stated, the ability of these devices to host multiple virtual servers, entire infrastructures, and work well and fast, is a definite strength.
  • The ability to stack these devices and have failover.
  • The upgrade program is great.
  • The unit did go through a lot of hard drives early on. It took them a while to figure out it was a firmware issue. Once that was fixed, it got better.
  • Firmware should have a "live" update process.
  • The price point could be better.
This platform is perfectly suited for any size virtual environment. As a backend to the production servers, these devices truly excel. If you are a busy IT person, running the department, doing the work too, doing project management, etc., then you simply can't beat the support provided by this company. They monitor remotely and have an excellent SLA. I would not recommend this product to small businesses, as the entry point is very high, and you do need technical know-how to have these devices in play.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
It is being used for the IT department or across the whole organization. It solves our IT Infrastructure growth issue. We are a small NetApp customer that uses mostly features such as Snapmirror and SnapStore primary of NetApp product portfolio. We have approximately 2 NetApp FAS in use today ranging from DR configurations all the way to small corporate data center installations. We are a long term customer with over 5 years of experience with NetApp in production and development at our company.

  • Replication
  • Recovery
  • Storage Provisioning
  • Documentation
  • User Interface
It is ideal for large organizations that have a variety of different business scenarios and locations from small to large. It is flexible and can grow.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source
We are a large NetApp customer that uses the full NetApp product portfolio. We have approximately 20PB of NetApp FAS in use today ranging from very small remote office configurations all the way to large corporate data center installations. We are a long term customer with over 8 years of experience with NetApp in production at our company.
  • The selling point for NetApp FAS is the application and data protection integration capabilities they provide.
  • We have been able to use NetApp FAS in a variety of use cases with a standard set of management tools.
  • NetApp FAS has evolved over the years from just NAS to also include block protocols. At this time they support almost all industry standard protocols.
  • Netapp needs to modernize and unify their management tools, and off tap integration products.
  • Netapp lost focus on solving customer business problems. They were too focused on their transformation to Clustered data ontap.
  • NetApp needs to move from a controller pair architecture (Tier2) to a multi-controller active-active architecture (Tier1).
NetApp FAS is a great platform to solve a large variety of different problems. It is ideal for large organizations that have a variety of different business scenarios and locations. This ability allows global support organizations to have standard tools and methods even in a variety of use cases and site sizes. On the flip side, this flexibility is also sometimes the weakness of the platform. In very specialized use cases/areas such as low latency with flash this can be a detriment. We still seem to use specialty arrays to solve these point requirements.