#1 most frequent
United States of America
66.7%70 installations of 105
What is Progress Test Studio?
Progress Test Studio aims to be the easiest to use Web Automation tool on the market, widely used by Enterprise QA’s for testing, but easy enough for anyone.
Categories & Use Cases
Media
1 / 4
Screenshot of Test Studio Mobile – Codeless Test Automation for iOS and Android: Native, Hybrid, and Mobile Web applications. Including sophisticated find logic for test re-use across multiple devices. The Android Instrumentation Wizard will get you testing in no time. And codeless maintenance will empower your QA’s.
Who Buys & Uses Progress Test Studio
#2 most frequent
Canada
7.6%8 installations of 105
#3 most frequent
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
7.6%8 installations of 105
Progress Test Studio
Pros
- Easy to configure.
- Plugins can be integrated easily with visual studio.
- Takes less time to run all the test scenarios, [and] also generates graphics report for all the tests.
- Keeps bugs [out of] the production.
Cons
- Cost is very high.
- It takes time to load the application; improvement needed.
Most Important Features
- It's having the platform to perform test cases for windows or desktop, Web applications, and manual. which is basically required in our organization because we developed all kinds of applications.
Return on Investment
- We are very satisfied to using this tool.
- Application deployment on time.
- stakeholders are very satisfied.
Other Software Used
Progress Kendo UI, Google Hangouts Meet, Microsoft Teams
One of the best UI Automation tools out there
Pros
- Very user-friendly interface.
- The element repository is a great feature and really help us save time when the interface is changed.
- C# or VB.net can be used to edit code making it even easier for those who have previous knowledge on such languages.
Cons
- The coding IDE is a tad slow compared to Visual Studio.
- Quite expensive, but there are several features that make up for the price.
Return on Investment
- Saved us a lot of time in manual testing, and therefore man hours.
Alternatives Considered
Selenium and Visual Studio IDE
Other Software Used
Visual Studio IDE
Great experience over all
Pros
- Great for Regression testing
- Cut down on test time
Cons
- Mobile test compatibility and ease of use
Return on Investment
- Mobile side in the begin had issues getting better with each release
Good experiences of TestStudio in cloud solution regression tests
Pros
- Easy to automate functional QUI tests
- Easy to analyze test results
- Easy to take in use and learn usage
Cons
- No major issues, automated scheduling has some tricks
Return on Investment
- Excellent results, workloads for continuous regresssion testing has been decreased by more than 50 percent.
- Time window needed for regression tests has decreased more than 50 percent.
TestStudio enabled test automation on a Silverlight application
Pros
- Easy to use.
- Reduces manual testing work considerably.
- Possibility to schedule test runs outside office hours.
Cons
- Client start-up time is a bit slow. Application is a bit sluggish, when there is a lot of tests open.
- Automated scheduling environment is a bit challenging to maintain.
Return on Investment
- Excellent results, workloads for continuous regression testing has been decreased by more than 50 percent.
- Time window needed for regression tests has decreased more than 50 percent.
Alternatives Considered
Selenium
Other Software Used
Visual Studio IDE, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, Microsoft Office 365
