Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) has 5 pricing edition(s), from $49 to $135. A free trial of Sugar Sell (SugarCRM) is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Essentials$49Cloud per month per user (3 user minimum, 5 user maximum) | Sugar Enterprise$85On Premise per month per user (billed annually) | Advanced$85Cloud per month per user (3 user minimum) | Sugar Enterprise+$135On Premise per month per user (billed annually) |
Premier$135Cloud per month per user (10 user minimum) |
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://www.sugarcrm.com/pricing
companies as well and I was tasked to get the crm and see if it could add value to where salesforce is lacking and that’s the source of the truth. … 100M in revenue or, more than 450 employees. Other than that[,] it is an affordable crm if a company does not want to invest…
integration with SQL. It can be customized to meet business requirements, it is cost effective and architectural integration is flexible, I like being able to
Lower cost product allows for still good and competent customer relationship management
Leads. Account conversion. Price. … SugarCRM can make sense in some scenarios where it is somewhat cheap to deploy and get up and running. Don't be fooled by simplicity though, because
SugarCRM is a poor man's version of SalesForce. It is cheaper yet easier to use.
Overall seems to be more expensive than other subscription based CRMs. Has positively impact our sales team
Sugar is an incredibly cost effective CRM solution. It allows us to reach thousands of children wishing
Its low cost, flexibility and ease of use make it stand out in a very cluttered market … Superior customer service, low cost of marketing, low cost of quote/contract management, low cost of ownership with minimal IT overhead Another … ran…
Small businesses may find use of the application because it's low cost. Or companies that have a pretty straightforward sales process and won't require … much more than we needed for reporting so it didn't make sense to pay the cost for SFDC just for that feature. Callidus…
Sugar's reporting is pretty simple to use once you get trained up on it. The pricing is good for an organization of our size. Ability to customize also good
Pricing is a major consideration with Sugar. When comparing Sugar with competitors, the cost to value ratio is outstanding. I really … Price Product Features Product Usability Third-party Reviews
at least see our customers and prospects in one place. However we cannot afford for all our key staff to have access to this information. … and did not have an opportunity to shop. I would have gone with a less expensive product with more built-in marketing integration and…
great fit for a company that wants the features of Salesforce but not the price, or if you need to be able to host the CRM yourself for security or customization … code. The price of SugarCRM is its second strength. It has…
SugarCRM is more stable and affordable. … Price Vendor Reputation … Price was good; although much can still be done. Pricing included support
It's a good cost effective solution and available to be self hosted. At times the software … More cost effective and allowed us to have it running on our own infrastructure instead
a mobile/web solution, then SugarCRM is near the top of the list and affordable. … a mobile/web solution, then SugarCRM is near the top of the list and affordable.
user that we believed we could avoid. Microsoft Dynamics CRM was *very* expensive and promised to be just as much (if not more) work to set up than SugarCRM
made changes to their system based on my company needs. It was way more affordable and then SalesForce and easier to maniuplate.
and it's the core of our business. This is significant for our company values.
Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend
Sugar is much more affordable than Salesforce.com and gives just as much functionality. What I like about Sugar is that they are more open source company/product … Sugar is much more affordable than Salesforce.com and gives just as much functionality. What I like
SugarCRM Admin functions and 'developer tools' are very easy to access and learn in order to do basic customizations on your own without the need of a developer.
Sugar's user-friendly interface, ease of customization, and affordability are advantages for SMB's wanting to track sales leads. Areas of improvement … Overall support and affordability.
was very insightful. From an operations standpoint, it was definitely more cost effective for our smaller organization, but offered some of the same key
