S3 is cost effective, works well, and provides many service levels.
September 08, 2019
S3 is cost effective, works well, and provides many service levels.

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service)
We are using S3 for storing compliance generated by various internal tools. The reports are not frequently accessed but we have legal guidelines for retention. We also use s3 to host static web interfaces with links to the document. It makes really easy to access the documents anywhere. We also use s3 to store various inputs to other AWS services such as AWS Sagemaker.
Pros
- S3 provides a cost-effective, reliable, and durable way to store objects.
- S3 can store files from almost any system with its great SDK and API.
- S3 provides multiple tiers of storage which make it cost-effective based on usage.
Cons
- I would like to see better control within the s3 bucket policies. It is hard to decide whether to use a bucket ACL or policy.
- I would like to see the ability to lock down list permissions and still see it in the AWS console.
- S3 has increased ROI in several of our projects due to the ability to utilize alternative storage tiers to store data.
- It has also allowed us to use it as a holding area to store data to be used by other AWS services.
S3 provides an on-demand usage model for storage. You only pay for what you use. Nutanix is an on-premises solution and does not allow for usage-based pricing. Azure was less integrated with our current AWS workloads which helped drive our decision to use s3 with the Amazon Cloud.
Do you think Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation