Simple and Cost Effecitve
Overall Satisfaction with Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service)
We utilize Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) cloud storage for public linking of audio files for our website's audio archive. Also we have all of our websites automatically push monthly backups to Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) cloud storage. It was simple to get started and has just worked for years without any more adjustments or changes needed.
Pros
- Public linking
- Pricing
- Support knowledgebase
Cons
- More User Friendly Interface
- Simplify some complicated functionality
- Simplified Cloud Storage
- Cost Effect Cloud Storage
More robust and feature rich. Also more cost effective. However, the other options do lend themselves to be better at user friendliness. But if your technological and willing to look up help in the support knowledgebase you will do just fine and get a better product at better pricing.
Do you think Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation