May 15, 2019
Haselden ConstructionConstruction, 201-500 employees
Score 10 out of 10
Overall Satisfaction with Bluebeam Revu
We have used project as document control for projects and used studio for collaboration and submittal review. I also use the markup tools almost daily. Colorado state university has adopted our processes for document control for all their construction projects.
- Dimensioning scaled PDF documents is one of the things I use the most. I can get an accurate measurement where one has not been provided
- Editing PDF documents- there are documents that are automatically created through systems software that may need to be edited to me to the specific needs of a particular project. With Bluebeam, you could do this with ease.
- Document control is a major strength of Bluebeam. I have used Bluebeam on a project that had over 18,000 drawings. We also used the link feature to hyperlink each page that had a fallout.
- The iPad is where Bluebeam has the most room to improve upon. I have used Bluebeam to record punch list as it is easy to create punch items but is not as simple to update the punch list status.
- Creating reports is also not a strength of Bluebeam. You cannot create a report to tell you what items are linked to each other.
- Storage, editing, and navigation are strengths of Bluebeam. But tracking document status is not a strength of Bluebeam.
- Being able to scale drawings with reasonable confidence is a time saver and prevents rework.
- Navigating drawings is a time saver that that is easy for even the least tech-savvy users.
- Editing documents instead of having to recreate then is an amazing time saver.
Procore is excellent for tracking documents and links. Bluebeam is superior at editing, scaling, and marking up documents. You can track projects of any size at a very low price point with Bluebeam.
Bluebeam Feature Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
Plan markups & sharing
Issue tracking & punchlists
Collaboration & approvals
Submittal design and management