Best browser testing solution available
October 06, 2025
Best browser testing solution available

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Team
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
We use BrowserStack to develop and test our internal and external websites. BrowserStack saves us the cost of having to purchase a wide range of devices to mirror what our users and clients use when interacting with our websites. We mostly use it for manual styling and JS testing across different browsers and mobile OSes.
Pros
- It has the best range of devices and browser combos
- Many useful ancillary services
- Very responsive emulators/real devices in the browser
Cons
- Documentation on some services is iffy - browser automation testing docs were not that useful
- Browser versions come and go - BrowserStack will go from having a particular combo of OS and browser version available but then a few months later it will not be available
- Would be nice to have proper custom configs of browser and OS where possible
- Manual browser testing
- Having a huge range of devices to test on
- Browser automation testing
- Lower costs compared to buying devices to test on ($1000s saved)
- Lower dev time spent on testing (saves a few hours a week)
We have not had the budget to buy all the popular devices in use each year, and so have had to make do with browser testing on phones available in the office from colleagues. BrowserStack obviously improves on that massively.
- Automate
BrowserStack's browser automation has been useful for doing visual regression testing. Previously, we had setups to do this that had been made manually (PhantomJS etc.) but BrowserStack makes it easier for our devs to use.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation