BrowserStack is a great multipurpose testing solution for development teams
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
We primarily use the Live, App Live, Accessibility Testing and Percy for testing purposes across our estate. This is segmented across a number of different platforms we support within our support division. We are starting to move more into the testing automation space, however we still use other tools for that purpose.
Pros
- Excellent live testing to simulate functionality across a variety of devices, operating systems and devices.
- Good AI capabilities within Percy to help automate visual tests which speeds up QA and regression testing.
- Provides a variety of testing tools and functionality in one suite of products which makes it easier to manage users and access.
Cons
- For large organizations, any improvements that can be made to manage licenses and access controls would be helpful.
- Integrate performance/load testing to replace other tools like Blazemeter.
- Make it easier to migrate testing frameworks from other applications like TestRail and at a competitive cost.
- Live Testing for GeoIP based troubleshooting
- Percy for visual testing
- Mobile application testing
- Providing a comprehensive tool kit makes it easier to manage efficiently
- The more we can automate, the more we can tend to future development and improvements
Inability to thoroughly test our platforms and websites across a multitude of devices, operating systems and browsers. It was also more difficult to reign in siloism whereby teams across our large business were using other tools which was coming at a cost.
- Live
- App Live
- App Automate
- Percy
- TestRail
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation