BrowserStack

Never made it past the trial, the team lead preferred BrowserStack's selection.

The tests on SauceLabs were less stable, the live devices took more time to load. We were unable to easily access the devtools when running on mobile devices and the support team took more time to answer us.

I, unfortunately, cannot answer this question as I have only used BrowserStack.

Availability to our tech stacks, the price, and sales/technical support

Has greater access to devices, great support and many data centre.

Litmus for email testing but it's not really a competitor of BrowserStack. No other products compare from what I've seen.

More efficient and effectivce user experience Better laid out screen Easier to navigate the site

BrowserStack has better Customer Support, better Community backup, more range of devices, and better Return on Investment than both of the above mentioned companies.

I'm using the app automate feature for Automation of mobile application. So, we are add Jenkins for CI process to use on BrowserStack. For mobile application testing, We are using Appium with java client in our framework and also integrate with BrowserStack capabilities.

BrowserStack had the most device types and availability of the devices compared to Kobiton and Amazon Device Farm. Price wise it was significantly cheaper than Saucelabs for the number of parallel threads needed.

Due to better Mobile App testing feature, we choose browserstack

Cost, device inventory, plugins for automation test

BrowserStack give more flexibility to us

Better UI

All are pretty good platforms and its tough to compare them. BrowserStack I felt was much more responsive from Support perspective and also better on performance of the platform.

We havent used any other alternative to browser. So cant comment on it.

Ease of use, more devices and availability are the first three things comes to my mind when it comes to BrowserStack ,and other aspect is price as well.

BrowserStack has many pros and cons over Kobiton. BrowserStack seems to have better security measures on fresh booting device each time. Kobiton I had noticed that users previous app sessions were retained and I could access the apps. Another plus is you can always open a device on BrowserStack with any devices, whereas in Kobiton if it is being used you need to wait. The only thing I preferred with Kobiton is the replay session is so smooth and seamless, automatically saving sessions to the users accounts and offers quick re-play if required with elements / responses. BrowserStack is lacking this at this point in time but makes up for other areas.

I never use other products like BrowserStack.

1. Access to real devices 2. Visual regression testing is available for users under all plans

When using Perfecto by Perfecto, we were experiencing issues with the product and the support, which we have not experienced since our subscription to BrowserStack