Cisco Meraki MX is suitable in some but not all cases
June 16, 2025
Cisco Meraki MX is suitable in some but not all cases
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Modules Used
- MX68
- MX84
- MX68CW
- MX100
- MX95
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX
We use Cisco Meraki MX to replace client sonic walls, juniper, fortigate, and others. We find it suitable in most cases BUT
Pros
- Ease of use
- Quick setup
- Auto vpn
- Dashboard tools easy to use
- DHCP vlans and up addressing quick and easy
Cons
- Nat
- Reverse NAT VÍA IPSEC NON MERAKI TUNNELS
- Inbound wan forewarn rules multi to multi nat
- Nat in general is horrible
- Msp read
- Easy to use
- Most engineers can learn it quickly
Quick learning curve
Cisco MS
CISCO ISE
CISCO ISE
Fortigate is almost as easy and has all the features of a traditional firewalll and more
Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?
No
Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?
No
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation