Item: Conductor
Rating: 8
Author: Nathan Richardson

Overall Satisfaction with Conductor

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As we've evolved as a company, our SEO has gone from basic SEO functions (keyword research, blog outlines, etc.) to more of an enterprise-level approach (meta-tag analysis, sitewide audits, core web vitals, etc.). With this shift, we found that our previous SEO tools (SEMRush, Ahrefs) no longer fit the bill completely.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Enterprise-level SEO
Core Web Vitals Analysis
Site Audits

Cons

Keyword research accuracy
Usability
Sitemap Analysis

Return on Investment

Improved page speed
Identified keyword gaps
Helped resolve errors

Support Rating

Pretty table-stakes customer service in my opinion.

Alternatives Considered

Screaming Frog SEO Spider, Ahrefs and BrightEdge

We moved to Conductor because the functionality matched what we were looking for. Price was not as much of a factor, thankfully, because Conductor is expensive.

Key Insights

Do you think Conductor delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Conductor's feature set?

Yes

Did Conductor live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Conductor go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Conductor again?

Likelihood to Recommend

Conductor is particularly well-suited for in-house SEO shops with limited bandwidth (which describes most in-house SEO these days). It's far less appropriate for agency use, where other tools outpace it in both cost and effectiveness. Conductor is definitely a more pricey tool.

Conductor Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Enterprise-Level SEO Tool ($$)