Meets Our Very Specific Needs
January 06, 2020

Meets Our Very Specific Needs

Jenna Carpentier | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

Episerver Content Cloud

Overall Satisfaction with Episerver Content Cloud

Episerver CMS is used across the whole organization but is mainly managed by my department - the communications department. Our entire website is run through Episerver, and each department is responsible for keeping their part of the website updated with current information, as far as making small edits (like text edits). Then the communications department oversees all of those changes and is in charge of making more involved updates (adding entirely new content, creating new pages, moving things around, etc).
  • Allows many different "users" with varying levels of editing access.
  • Easy to see what recent changes have been made and who made them.
  • The website, including the editing portion, seems to be down quite often - so that we cannot make changes - or it allows us to make changes but then doesn't properly save them.
  • Customer service and user support is lacking. We've reported problems to them, yet it never seems to get fixed.
  • It allows us to set different prices for different user groups - making membership more attractive since you get better product pricing as a member.
  • Making updates and changes is not very intuitive and can take a long time to complete things that should be simple tasks.
Content Author / Administrator
While other CMS software like Wix and WordPress are a lot more intuitive and aesthetically pleasing, they don't have the full functionality of what we need. As mentioned, we need to have varying levels of user access, with different product price points for each group, and we need the ability to house and organize thousands of documents. This is why we went with Episerver even though it's lacking in some of the other areas.
We have a lot (thousands) of technical documents on our website and we have very specific needs for them. We are a trade organization with varying levels of membership, and thus need to restrict certain content to specific user groups. Additionally, some of our content is free, some we charge for, and some have different prices for different groups. It gets very involved, but Episerver handles it well for the most part. So while the web content isn't displayed in the most aesthetically appealing of ways, it is at least there and only visible to those who should see it. So I'd say that it really just depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for something simple and won't have tons of content and PDFs and academic journals, etc. for different user groups, then another CMS will likely be better for you. If you do need specific functionality like what I've explained, then yes, Episerver could work well for you.

Optimizely Content Management System Feature Ratings

WYSIWYG editor
7
Code quality / cleanliness
5
Admin section
6
Page templates
3
Library of website themes
2
Mobile optimization / responsive design
4
Publishing workflow
7
Form generator
5
Content taxonomy
6
SEO support
5
Bulk management
7
Availability / breadth of extensions
4
Community / comment management
4
API
5
Internationalization / multi-language
Not Rated
Role-based user permissions
8