Overall Satisfaction with F5 BIG-IP
We currently use F5 Big-IP as an application delivery controller for our email security, web security, and AD federated services. This design supports 60K users daily in a failover design.
- Load balancing
- Fail over
- Traffic monitoring statistics
- Ease of maintenance of load balanced devices
- Better logging
- Easier to implement custom options without learning TCL
- Negative: Cost of lab licenses to mimick our production.
- Positive: less down time for maintenance and outages increased production times
- Positive: SSL offloading increased server response times.
Kemp is getting more mature but F5 is still superior. While the Kemp UI is easier F5 allows for more option and customization. I still feel Kemp is strong due to their no-cost lab license.
Using BIG-IP
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Easy to use Technical support not required Consistent Convenient Feel confident using | Lots to learn |
- Setting up pools
- Creating monitors
- Easy to use UI
- TCL programming
- Creating custom iRules