Great for SSLVPN
December 07, 2019
Great for SSLVPN

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with F5 BIG-IP
It's used by the network team as a load balancer and a VPN concentrator.
- SSLVPN
- Load balancing
- SSL offloading
- Great support
- Interface is somewhat confusing.
- Hard to find tutorials/learning.
- Cost.
- Helped replace an aging ASA-based IPSec VPN solution.
- Enabled VPN connections from a range of devices, including mobile.
- The only downside is that troubleshooting is relatively hard for someone with little F5 experience.
SSLVPN on F5 works much better than IPSec on ASA. From the user's side, no configuration is required - the user can just install the VPN client, input the URL, and the F5 client does the rest. For ASA, profile installation or configuration is required, so the user must go to help desk, which is a big drawback. I also found the SSLVPN to be more stable.
FortiClient installation/licensing is somewhat harder and more clunky, while configuration on the user's side is comparable to F5.
SonicWall SSLVPN is also very counterintuitive on Windows 10, with the user having to go to different places in the interface and Windows settings to start/stop their connection, while their IPSec VPN is better.
For load balancing, F5 stacks up well to NetScaler, with potentially more options using iRules.
FortiClient installation/licensing is somewhat harder and more clunky, while configuration on the user's side is comparable to F5.
SonicWall SSLVPN is also very counterintuitive on Windows 10, with the user having to go to different places in the interface and Windows settings to start/stop their connection, while their IPSec VPN is better.
For load balancing, F5 stacks up well to NetScaler, with potentially more options using iRules.
Do you think F5 BIG-IP delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with F5 BIG-IP's feature set?
Yes
Did F5 BIG-IP live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of F5 BIG-IP go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy F5 BIG-IP again?
Yes