Excellent, on the verge, and a bit buggy
February 05, 2025

Excellent, on the verge, and a bit buggy

Federico Romano | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

Figma Organization

Overall Satisfaction with Figma

We use it for
- Building systemic mappings (blueprints, flow maps, information architecture maps)
- Building low-fi visions
- Building prototypes for testing
- Documenting in hi-fi for Dev handoff

We are a team of 6 professionals (me as a Lead, 3 Interaction Designers, a Content Designer and a Researcher)

Pros

  • Collaboration in real time, zero delays, extremely lightweight application for being a web application
  • Componentization, super flexible set of properties and combinations
  • Highly detailed version history

Cons

  • Autolayout is still not as complex as CSS Flex, it should aim to be at par
  • Variables should be able to be tied to Components and referenced when prototyping to have the concept of Local Variables (this.Variable)
  • Components have a bug. If you create a Component in File A, then insert an instance of that component in File A, then copy-paste it into File B, the instance in File B never receives updates on the original component. But if the instance is inserted through the Library, it does get the updates. That's a huge bug.
  • Improved team collaboration
  • Single source of truth for Design definitions
  • Accelerated time for Devs to read UI documentation (measurements)
  • Scalable design process when components are correctly defined
Figma is a non-intuitive software, and i support it. Is not meant for anyone and is not meant to be accesible, but rather to have professionals working faster, cutting edges and optimizing design work. Reason why a huge ton of UI functionalities are buried in the interface and are difficult to learn.
Adobe XD is an absurd copycat that never got to have even 10% of Figma's features. It's hyper fast because it's native, but that's the only good thing it has.

Axure RP is an excellent prototyping software, with Local Variables and complex interactions. But it's also extremely heavy to run in any computer, it doesnt use the GPU, it's not pixel perfect, the HTML generated in prototypes is awful.

Do you think Figma delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Figma's feature set?

Yes

Did Figma live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Figma go as expected?

No

Would you buy Figma again?

Yes

Well suited for
- Component/Design system building
- Hi-fi deliverables for Front End Development

Not well suited for
- Flow mapping, they've built FigJam for that, but you cannot make diagrams personalized to a complex degree
- Low-fi wireframing, the pixel perfect interface tends to force people to think in hi-fi

Comments

More Reviews of Figma