It was one of the nicest virtual servers I've ever worked with
February 28, 2022
It was one of the nicest virtual servers I've ever worked with

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Power System Virtual Server
For a service that we utilized for around seven months, it comes in handy. A few tiny hiccups happened while I was using it, but they were easily remedied. It reduced the amount of time it took to complete activities and copy data. Its AI is critical, as the judgments it makes are more accurate and useful in the workplace.
Pros
- Its accuracy and dependability distinguish it from the competition
- Unlike other virtual power systems, it is speedy and has few network issues
- It is more reliable, precise, and performs better. It looks to have the best connection of all the virtual power systems
Cons
- It is also affordable, but having this many efficient systems at a lower cost is adequate
- Notably, it can become stuck owing to excessive use, such as restless work, creating job interruption
Do you think IBM Power Virtual Server delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Power Virtual Server's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Power Virtual Server live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM Power Virtual Server go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Power Virtual Server again?
Yes
- High-performance computing
- Power usage is reduced
We went with it due to its high levels of precision, effectiveness, and quickness. It's been a lifesaver at work, allowing us to stay on top of a slew of projects. We're going with this one since it's the cheapest and the easiest to maintain, so we're sticking with it.
As a result of using a single platform, the user is able to prevent superfluous actions and activities to maintain the platform's safety, in addition to recovering in a shorter period of time. User errors can also be avoided if any action the user can't continue is halted by an error.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation