CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Loves Intacct!!
Updated December 23, 2015
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP Loves Intacct!!
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Software Version
Current
Modules Used
- ALL
Overall Satisfaction with Intacct
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP is a premier partner with Intacct and we try to use it with all the organizations that we can. It makes the jobs of our outsourcing staff and external accounting staff a breeze. I personally implement and use the application regularly and think it is a rather impressive product and in particular work with it with other third party applications such as Bill.com, which is a very good integration that we use with quite a few of our clients among other applications to handle all of their accounting needs.
Pros
- Reporting
- Centralization of Accounting Data
- Rights and Permissions Customization and Roles
Cons
- Working with third party applications (not just having them construct the sync but making it a priority to work with them and/or make the integration in house)
- Support Channel and turn around on tickets unless escalated to higher people
- Partner Managers (Sometimes come off really rude and abrasive)
- Reduces the need for clerk entry roles
- Allows the clients to see data in real time (depending on engagement terms)
- Proves its worth over time without much need to explain it
- QuickBooks Online,QuickBooks Premier,QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions,Bill.com
Bill.com crushes Intacct solo AP management, if it wasn't for Bill.com we wouldn't have been able to secure a lot of our clients. When we can’t pitch Intacct to clients because of pricing issues, we generally use QuickBooks Online or QuickBooks Desktop and they work pretty well until the client out grows them. Once they become multi-entity or multi-currency, QuickBooksOnline and QuickBooks Desktop really can't handle them any more and that is usually a perfect [reason] to switch to Intacct [and] it is no longer a pricing issue.
- 25% to 50% of my clients
Sage Intacct Feature Ratings
Using Intacct
150 - All roles from implementors to processors to CFOs to data entry
15 - Bare minimum CORE implementation training from Intacct but usually more.
Intacct Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation