Overall Satisfaction with Jama Connect
We are doing the parent requirement cascade and traceability. Moreover, we are working on defining the means of compliance for safety-related requirements.
- Tagging usernames using @
- Icons are easy to understand
- Requirements are easy to transform between text and requirement
- Easy to navigate amoung different baselines and projects
- In my experience, login takes longer, even when you are logged in it never saves - every time have to login again
- Not intuitive to undo updates - wrongly update wording of a requirement for example
- Not intuitive to recall the history of a specific requirement, all logins that updated and what this specific login has done
Do you think Jama Connect delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Jama Connect's feature set?
Yes
Did Jama Connect live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Jama Connect go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Jama Connect again?
Yes
- Engagement to people into the req. management culture
- A more robust requirements management control
Certification of the aircraft into the aviation regulatory institutes. E.g: CAA, and EASA.
It is much more intuitive, and user-friendly than DOORS for example. It is better in terms of a learning curve for a junior engineer to engage in the requirements management word.
JAMA can navigate between them, as far as it generates reports accessible through MS Project, Word, and Excel. Moreover, very likely it can be embedded into Confluence as well however, we have not yet implemented this feature.
Yes - Dassault Systèmes 3DX.