Review of JAMS Scheduler
January 30, 2025
Review of JAMS Scheduler

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with JAMS
JAMS was used to execute JDE batch processing as well as run Oracle stored procedures and Powershell scripts
Pros
- Ability to manage jobs across multiple platforms
- Great error handling, alerting, recovery and management
- Scripting options with Powershell scripts provided enhanced capability
- Ability to manage, define and schedule jobs through a single interface
Cons
- Installation process needs improvement due to minor bugs specifically for JDE integration
- Ability to create Powershell scripts from GUI schedules would be nice
- Updated documentation to cater for current release (found some gaps on occasion)
- Reduced manual intervention saving time for resources
- Improved reliability of jobs and management compared to prior solutions
- Ability to act on job issues when notifications are sent ensuring the business impact is minimised
Tidal is a very good scheduler but very expensive and customers can't budget for this. REvScheduler is a lot cheaper but the interface isn't very aesthetics and functionality is lacking compared to JAMS. Out of all of them I'd recommend JAMS.
Do you think JAMS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with JAMS's feature set?
Yes
Did JAMS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of JAMS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy JAMS again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation