Best Publishing Platform We've Used
Overall Satisfaction with Khoros Marketing (Formerly Spredfast + Lithium)
At Midco, we use Khoros Marketing (Formerly Spredfast + Lithium) to streamline social media publishing done by the marketing department. Marketing allows us to collaborate with stakeholders in other departments, such as our colleagues in our company's sports network. We have 14 social media accounts and can control them all from one dashboard with Khoros Marketing (Formerly Spredfast + Lithium).
Pros
- Ease of publishing/scheduling
- Easy approval/queue process
- Campaign organization
- Labeling for analytics
- Robust analytics
Cons
- Publishing to stories (not available)
- Publishing GIFs to Facebook (they get posted as a still image)
- Ability to sponsor posts/create ads within platform (hopefully coming soon)
- Better analytics for actionable insights and proof of ROI for social advertisers
- Time savings due to streamlined publishing
- Ability to do more with a smaller staff due to streamlined workflow
Do you think Khoros Social Media Management delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Khoros Social Media Management's feature set?
Yes
Did Khoros Social Media Management live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Khoros Social Media Management go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Khoros Social Media Management again?
Yes
Khoros Marketing (Formerly Spredfast + Lithium) had more robust publishing features and better API integrations than the others. It allowed us to do more from within the platform rather than having to do a lot of things in the organic social platforms. We also liked the way it scales for team members.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation