Great production, has significantly helped our organization's collaboration; A bit pricey for personal use.
Overall Satisfaction with Lucidspark
LucidSpark really shines early on in the design process, when thinking through and collaborating about architecture. It is a great tool for modeling systems at a high level and communicating with others.
Pros
- Systems and architecture collaboration
- Communication of intent
- Discourages delving too deeply into implementation
Cons
- Think of LucidSpart as a whiteboard -- Its strengths and weaknesses are similar.
- LucidSpark's costs is a barrier for entry for personal use.
- It has provided an easy and agreed upon tool for early collaboration
- It has greatly improved team buy-in on design approach before writing code
The integrations with other tools seem nice in principle, but our organization hasn't really found a need for it in practice.
Lucidspark is consistent and reliable, it has many-fold increased early on collaboration and decreased peer review conflicts (since major ideas [were] already agreed upon.)
Do you think Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite's feature set?
Yes
Did Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite again?
Yes
Previously, we've used Powerpoint, which isn't bad. LucidSpark integrates better with the other Lucid tools, but Powerpoint has more shapes available which [are] sometimes useful.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation